The Acts of the Apostles 62

Subtitle: Faith Working through Love

Acts 16:1-10.  This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on November 5, 2023.

Paul and Silas have started on Paul’s Second Missionary Journey, due to a disagreement between Paul and Barnabas about John Mark.

Today, we are going to look at this question.  What is the motivation behind what you do?  Two people (or more) can do the same action, but for very different reasons.  We could boil them all down to good motivations versus bad ones.  Of course, when we come to faith in Christ, we find out that Jesus isn’t content with only changing our outward actions.

Yes, he wants us to stop sinning (“Go and sin no more.”) because our sin causes pain and suffering to us and to the people in our lives.  God loves us and them too much to be content with us continuing to sin with impunity. 

Yet, if you only change the activity without changing the heart behind it, it will not be good enough.  It won’t work for very long.  Eventually, such people grow weary of “doing” good, and fall away from actions of righteousness.  So, Christ is not content to affect our activity.  He wants to change us from the inside out.

Let’s look at our passage.

Paul’s second missionary journey reaches Asia Minor again (v. 1-10)

Luke’s narrative jumps to the area of Derbe and Lystra in the middle of Asia Minor (Turkey today).  In short, they are going to travel between 750 to 800 miles in these 10 verses.

It is at Lystra that Paul recognizes a young man named Timothy, and he desires Timothy to join them.  Of course, Timothy is not just “joining” a missionary group.  He  really is entering into a lifetime of ministering for Jesus.  He becomes a son in the faith to Paul a father figure.  The dynamics here are significant.  Silas is a peer of Paul’s.  He is like a brother in the Lord, similar to Barnabas.  However, young Timothy is more like a son.  He will be mentored by Paul and Silas (really by the Holy Spirit through them).  In fact, there are two books of the New Testament written by Paul as a fatherly figure to Timothy (1 and 2 Timothy).  In fact, 2 Timothy has the feel of a father telling his son to stay strong as he is about to exit this life.

From these two letters (1 and 2 Timothy), we know that Timothy’s mother and grandmother have been strong believers (2 Timothy 1:5).    His mother, Eunice, had married a Greek man who clearly was not a convert to Judaism as we will soon see.  His grandmother Lois and her daughter Eunice most likely believed in Jesus during Paul’s first missionary journey through Lystra.

By the way, we should guard against the idea that Judaism and Christianity were two separate religions.  Jesus did not come to start a new religion.  He was the Messiah, the fulfillment of all that the Law of Moses was pointing to.  The people of Israel had waited for Messiah to come for centuries.  Thus, we would not say that Lois and Eunice were saved, but that their saving faith in Yahweh to send Messiah, had now made the proper transition to faith in Yeshua, whom the Father had sent.  The early Jewish believers were simply obeying the Holy Spirit by getting up and following Jesus.

This brings up an issue.  We can be guilty of giving lip service to God’s promise of sending Jesus back again.  This was on display in Israel in the first century.  Many of them would give lip service to the idea that Messiah would come and set all things right some day.  However, most had given up faith that he would actually show up.  They had the correct doctrine, but their faith was gone in their hearts.

Yet, one day Jesus did come.  He caught most of them by surprise, or better, he caught them spiritually sleeping, spiritually intoxicated, and spiritually dead. 

They were so used to being the ones who  had the truth, that they had lost their ability to repent and follow God.  How do you exercise your ability to repent and follow the Holy Spirit, rather than resisting and rebelling against Him?

In short, you spend time seeking God in the word and in prayer.  You give him your whole heart in truth.  You seek what He is saying to you through the Holy Spirit and what He saying to you, where He is leading you.  Such a relationship will teach you to exercise faith as the Holy Spirit puts His finger on areas of your life that need to change.  If you will give yourself to this, you will find all sorts of ways that you need to repent, and every day.  You will find just how much we need His help, and, praise God, that He is giving it to us all the time, if we will receive it.

It is probably at this time that the elders of the church and Paul gather around Timothy and pray for him as is mentioned twice in Paul’s letters.  We are told that gifts of the Holy Spirit were given to him on that day, and that at least one prophecy was given regarding him.

Now, this is an important point.  They do not take for granted that they are doing God’s work and that He will just show up.  They take this moment seriously and pray over Timothy.  We should never take God’s promised help for granted.  We need to seek it, and pray for it.  What a powerful moment as they pray over this young man.  “Lord, fill him with your Spirit, and enable him to minister with Paul and Silas.  Give him courage and faith.  Give him perseverance, Lord!”  Whether Timothy was already filled with the Spirit at that time, or the Spirit came upon him for the first time, Timothy was readied to go with Paul and Silas.

On the flip side, just because God has enabled you, placed gifts within your life, and filled you with His presence, doesn’t mean that we should take His continued empowerment for granted.  In 1 Tim. 4:14, Paul tells Timothy not to “neglect” the gift that was within him, and in 2 Tim. 1:6 , he tells him to “stir up” the gift that was within him.  The gifts of God are not automatic.  I am not saying that God will withhold from us, but that we can grow stagnant in our spiritual walk.  If we are negligent and lose our passion, then stagnation creeps into our hearts and quenches the gifts of God in our life.  In fact, the greatest gift within any of us, is the gift of the Holy Spirit.  We can grieve the Holy Spirit and squelch His work in our life if we are not purposeful and intentional in prayer. 

How do we stir them up?  We do so through prayer, and prayerful study of the Word.  Also, we do so by seeking the Holy Spirit, and as He leads, exercising our faith through obedience.

We may be taken by surprise that Paul would have Timothy circumcised at this point.  He is carrying a letter from the Apostles in Jerusalem laying out the fact that circumcision is not necessary for salvation.  This may come across to some as a contradiction, but it really is not, if you look closely.

Notice that the issue in Acts 15 was about what was necessary for Gentile salvation.  The council made a clear pronouncement on this issue, but there was still some lack of specificity regarding Jews themselves. Of course, Peter made it clear that none of the Jews were saved by their law keeping, only by faith in Jesus.  Jews and Gentiles were being saved in the same way.

There is some dispute about whether Timothy is considered a Jew or not.  When a person’s parents were both Jewish, there was no question.  They were a Jews.  But, when one of the parents were not Jewish, a question could arise.  Today, Jews teach that Jewishness, or obligation to the Law, follows the mother.  If your mother is Jewish, then so are you.  However, if only your father is Jewish, you are not considered Jewish.  It is not clear evidence that the first century followed a “matrilineal” descent as opposed to a patrilineal descent (from the father).  I don’t think that it makes a difference either way.

I only bring up this issue because it begs the question.  Did the early Church expect, or teach that Jews should circumcise their children and follow the law of Moses?  Did they teach Jewish believers in Yeshua to continue to circumcise new babies?  There would most likely be some ethnic momentum in how Jewish Christians lived.  I doubt that they all started eating pork after Peter’s vision in Joppa.  It just wasn’t part of their culture.  Therefore, we are unable to determine exactly how Timothy was viewed by early Jewish Christians, but we would know how he was viewed by non-Christian Jews.

So we come back to the issue of whether or not Paul is contradicting himself.    Why would he say one thing about Gentiles and another about Timothy?  What is going on here?  As I said at the beginning, motivation is the key.  What is Paul’s motivation?  What is his concern?

Verse three tells us why Paul does this, “because of the Jews who were in that region, for they knew that his father was a Greek.”  Paul clearly wanted to minister to Jews in the region, but also knew that they would know that Timothy was not circumcised.  Most likely, Paul believes that Timothy’s status would become a distraction and get in the way of preaching the Gospel.  The Jews would be so upset by Paul having an uncircumcised Jewish person with him, that they would never get to sharing the Gospel.  Timothy would be a distraction.

I think that Galatians 5 is the best passage for settling this.  There, Paul makes clear the principle that he was following in telling some people not to be circumcised, and yet in this case, circumcising Timothy.

Galatians 5:1-6 has Paul speaking to Gentiles in Galatia (basically the area they are in here in Acts 16).  They were being persuaded by some to circumcise themselves.  In verse 2, Paul tells them that “Christ will profit you nothing [if you circumcise yourself].”  In verse 3, he tells them that if they obey this one point of the Law of Moses then they are “a debtor to keep the whole law.”  In verse 4, Paul says that they are severing themselves from Christ and falling from grace, if they do this.  These are strong words that imply that they could not be saved, if they were circumcising themselves as a necessary act.  Your faith is either in Jesus or in the works of your flesh.  You cannot have both.

You might think of Jesus as Noah’s ark.  You are either in the boat (in Jesus) trusting him for your salvation, or you are outside the boat trusting in your own ability.  However, you can’t be in the boat and not in the boat at the same time.  Faith in Jesus is the ark of the New Testament.

Yet, in verse 6, Paul gives his underlying principle, which allows him to say to one group that they cannot be saved if they circumcise themselves, and yet have Timothy be circumcised.  His principle is not, if you are Jewish, you should be circumcised.  Rather, circumcision or the lack thereof has no power to accomplish anything.  It is quite clear that he is speaking about spiritual matters here.  If you want salvation and spiritual power with God, then your circumcised status is powerless to help you.  Don’t look to that to help you.  Now, you can see why he speaks so strongly to the Galatians.  They were circumcising themselves out of the belief that it would help them with God, but it can’t.

What does have power with God?  Faith [in Jesus] expressing itself through actions of love.  This is exactly what Paul is asking Timothy to do.  Paul is not telling Timothy that he is almost saved, but only lacks being circumcised (an argument that was being made to the Gentiles by the Judaizers).  Rather, he is asking him to be circumcised out of love for the Jews that they will preach to.  It will remove an obstacle that would be hard for them to overlook.  Now, it will not be an issue, and they can focus on the Gospel.  Timothy’s motivation would be love for the Jews that they will preach to.  The Galatians improper motivation was to fulfill an act that they thought was necessary for salvation.

I should say that this is quite a big “ask” of Paul to Timothy.  Yet, love will make great sacrifices for those it loves.  May God help us to remove obstacles in our lives without sinning in order to help others hear the Gospel.  May God help us to make sacrifices of things that are not necessary for salvation, but might be necessary in order for others to be saved.

We are then told that they go through the cities delivering the decrees of the Jerusalem Council, strengthening the churches, and sharing the Gospel.  Note that it says they “increased in number daily.”

They are called to Macedonia (v. 6-10)

As they move from Lystra eastward, they pass through the provinces of Galatia and Phrygia.  At this point (unless they go south), they are at the end of the churches that Paul and Barnabas had started earlier, and towns that they had preached in.  As they reach these borders, it appears that they intend to go southwest into the province of Asia.  This is the area of Ephesus and the 7 churches of Revelation. 

We are simply told that the Holy Spirit forbid them to preach the Gospel in Asia.  The Holy Spirit can lead us by forbidding or blocking things.  We are not told exactly how they knew the Holy Spirit was forbidding them.  Such a strong term would indicate that there was some kind of prophecy, word of wisdom, or dream, etc.  Some powerful way that the Holy Spirit made His direction clear to them.

This may cause us to wonder at the idea that the Holy Spirit would forbid any one to preach the Gospel to another.  Yet, we can know by what the Bible says that it has nothing to do with God not wanting them to hear it.  We are not told the reasons, so I want to be careful here.  It is possible that God knows this area will be reached by churches later, or that Paul and company can only do so much.  Limited resources require strategy and timing.  It will be come clear that Paul and Silas were intent on traveling throughout all of Asia Minor, but God wanted them to jump the Gospel over to Greece.  Others would “backfill” ministry into the areas that Paul skipped over.

In such a case, we should recognize that it is not our place to question God.  He has His reasons and they are always righteous and for the good.  In fact, if we refuse to go where God is calling us to go, and persist in going where He has not told us to go, we will be much like Jonah.  Things will go better for you and the people you speak to when you are obeying the Spirit of God.

Paul is obedient and turns to go north into Bithynia and Pontus, but again, the Holy Spirit forbids them to go north.  Thus, they end up on the coast of Asia Minor in the city of Troas.  No doubt, they minister there, but also the question is pondered.  Where do we go now?

Let me insert at this point, that God is not stuck on any one way of leading and directing us.  He spoke to Moses like one speaks face to face with another man.  That is extremely rare.  Sometimes, He speaks to people through angels.  He can speak to us through visions and dreams, through a word of knowledge, or simply by a quiet voice in our heart.  It doesn’t matter how God leads us.  What matters is that He is the One leading.  Don’t  be fixated on needing to have God use any of these.  Simply respond to how He leads in your life.  In fact, notice that Timothy is being led by the Holy Spirit through the man Paul.

It is at this point that Paul has a vision.  In the vision, he sees a Macedonian man pleading, “Come over here and help us!”  Of course, there probably was not an actual man in Macedonia who was doing this.  But, God hears the hearts of a people.  The Holy Spirit was giving Paul a sense of what God saw in this region, a people crying out for help.

Of course, our hearts can cry out for help, but often we don’t even know what that help should look like, especially in spiritual matters.  Macedonia is northern Greece, where Alexander the Great came from.  Just as God used a vision to instruct Peter to share the Gospel with Cornelius in Caesarea, so God uses a vision to stir Paul’s heart for Greece.  This is not because God loves them more.  No, He wants all people to hear the Gospel and come to faith in Jesus.  However, Paul is mortal and cannot evangelize everyone.  The Holy Spirit is strategically leading him to spread the Gospel in a way that is more effective.

I wonder how many people and places are pleading for someone to come and help them, but no one share the Gospel with them.  You will never see it because it is a spiritual things.  And, they won’t even know that you are the answer of the cry of their heart when you first start speaking to them.  However, God sees them, and hears them.  We really need to learn to listen to God and be led by him as we share the Gospel with people.

Notice that Paul didn’t need a vision for everyone he ever shared the Gospel with.  In general, he knew that the Gospel needed to go everywhere.  He was doing God’s will in general until God needed him to do something specific.  This is where we need to trust the Lord.  If He needs to direct us, He knows how to do it.  I should not be paralyzed while waiting for a vision, when I could be doing what I know the Lord wants me to do in general.

I do think that we should develop the practice of talking with God in prayer about our evangelism plans, who we want to talk to, and when.  We should pray for the Spirit to go before us and prepare their hearts, and we should fast and pray for their response to the Gospel.  In short, it should be our faith in Jesus (and his purpose for us) working itself out through actions of love for the lost (sharing the Gospel).

Perhaps, this week, we can spend some time asking God what we can sacrifice, so that others may hear the Gospel.  May the Lord enable us by His Holy Spirit!

Faith through Love audio

The Acts of the Apostles 61

Subtitle: Dwelling in Unity

Acts 15:30-41.  This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on October 29, 2023.

We have just looked at an example of the Church coming to an agreement about a serious issue that involved salvation.  This wasn’t something that they could overlook.

Of course, when people disagree, generally at least one of them are wrong, and sometimes, both are wrong.  The good news is that the Bible is very clear about things that are necessary for salvation.  You don’t have to go to a particular person to learn it, even though God does use people to bring the Gospel to us.  Yet, when you believe, you become responsible to learn the word for yourself, and to seek the filling and leading of the Holy Spirit for yourself.

Today, we have an issue that does not involve salvation.  Have you ever noticed that we can be very passionate about things that are not essential for salvation?  Some issues are trivial, but others are indirectly connected to the Gospel.  The Bible may not say that a particular belief about abortion is necessary for salvation.  However, to embrace abortion as a good, would demonstrate a misunderstanding of what God’s word is saying to us.  At some point, you may be saying the right things, but really serving another Jesus (one that approves of abortion, homosexuality, and transgender surgeries), and following another Gospel (one that doesn’t call for works worthy of repentance).

We are going to look at the issue of unity today.  We should never take unity in the Spirit of God for granted.  The enemy of our souls plots day and night in order to tear apart any unity in Christ that we may have.  Paul warned the elders of the Ephesian church in Acts 20:29-31:

“For I know this, that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock.  Also from among yourselves men will rise up, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after themselves.  Therefore watch, and remember that for three years I did not cease to warn everyone night and day with tears.”

This is how serious the Gospel is, both for those in the first century and for us all this time later.  You could say that it is harder for us to hold the line on right doctrine due to the many teachers over the last 20 centuries.

Let’s look at our passage.

The letter from Jerusalem is read in Antioch (v. 30-35)

The Jerusalem church had sent a letter to the Gentile churches explaining the decision they had made.  It was entrusted into the hands of Barnabas and Paul (who were based in Antioch at the time), and Judas Barsabas and Silas (from the Jerusalem church).

When they arrive in Antioch, the whole church is gathered together in order to hear the letter.  Notice that it refers to the church as a “multitude” at this point.  In both the Jerusalem Council and in the reading of the letter at Antioch, we see the Church being very open about the dispute and how it was resolved.  There is no sense that they are protecting the people from the issue, or making the decision in a backroom with a select few.  No, the whole church is involved.

It is sad to see what goes for leadership in our modern churches.  Too often, we protect the poor sodden masses of believers from the issues that we are facing, and make decisions that we then attempt to market and advertise back to the members so that they will embrace what we have determined.  This is not a healthy thing, nor is it a godly thing.

Now, we should not confuse this process with the one that Jesus gives in Matthew 18, where two people are having issues between them.  That would be a reconciliation process between two believers.  However, in our text today, we are looking at what is a doctrinal issue.  The teaching of doctrine is always a public matter, and everyone should be made aware of false teachings in our midst, and what is the proper doctrine.  This has to do with how we define the Gospel and salvation for Gentiles.

In verse 31, we are told that the reading of the letter brought rejoicing to the group.  There is a certain joy that should be had when God helps us to have unity around the truth.  Please know that when you pick up your Bible, you can be confident that it represents what the apostles and our Lord Jesus taught.  This was confirmed by the elders and saints of the first century, establishing a sure foundation.

Unity is not about never having disagreements.  We are not unified around never having issues to work through.  Rather, we are unified around letting the Holy Spirit and the Word of God show us how to resolve our differences.  You may blanch at the fact that church life can be messy, but look at your own family, or even look at your own spiritual walk.  Following Jesus is messy for an individual, and it is messy for parents leading a family.  Why would we suddenly think that a church family, which is far larger, should somehow not be messy?  What I mean by messy is that there are times of disagreements, squabbles, and yet we seek to work them out in the love of Jesus.

We are also told that Judas and Silas, who were prophets, exhorted and strengthened the brethren with many words.  In this situation, it does not appear that they are prophesying about future events.  They are speaking by the Spirit of God to their present situation, and encouraging the people in how they can proceed in serving Christ with confidence.

After some time had passed, it was only natural that Judas and Silas would be going back to Jerusalem.  It doesn’t say that a letter was made, but I wouldn’t be surprised.  At the least, they would take a message back to Jerusalem of the joy and fraternal feelings that the church in Antioch had towards them.

There is an issue with verse 34.  Some manuscripts (and thus, some versions) do not have the statement that “it seemed good to Silas to remain there.”  Of course, even without this verse, it will be clear by verse 40 that Silas had decided to stay instead of going to Jerusalem with Silas.  So, is the verse original, but taken out by later scribes?  Or, was it not original and someone inserted it to make better sense of the flow of the story?  The second is the most likely of the two.  Regardless, It is not the kind of thing that changes the story, or even more important, changes doctrine.

We should not jump to the conclusion that Luke made an error in his story.  Luke is describing how it happened and isn’t concerned with making every little fact explicit.  The story is understandable without verse 34.  Luke says nothing about how Judas and Silas respond to the desire to have them deliver a message.  Perhaps, Silas was originally preparing to go back, but something made him stay.  Did God change his mind, did the following episode change his mind?  We do not know.  However, unforeseen circumstances will lead to Silas going with Paul on a missionary trip.  In all of this, we know that God was leading them and knew that Paul would need someone like Silas.

Barnabas and Paul divide over John Mark (v. 36-41)

In this section, Luke describes a sharp disagreement between Barnabas and Paul, and it centers on John Mark.  The dispute happens when it comes to Paul’s heart to revisit the churches they had started earlier.  They could find out how the churches were doing and minister to them.

Barnabas clearly agrees.  Yet, trouble surfaces when Barnabas determines to take John Mark with them.  Remember that John Mark had gone with them on the first missionary journey.  When they reached the shores of Pamphylia, he abandoned them and went home.

I would point out to us that Luke is doing more than just telling a story.  Notice that the chapter opens with a doctrinal issue that created a strong dispute between some of the believers.  Paul and Barnabas had worked together to help that matter be resolved peacefully.  Yet, in a smaller matter that did not involve doctrine, they seemed unable to find a peaceful resolution.

We should also recognize that these are two men who are filled with the Holy Spirit, who have prophetic gifts, and have other men around them who are prophets.  Yet, the situation becomes so sharp that they decide to “agree to disagree,” and go their own ways.  We should recognize that this is not a matter of doctrine, but of opinion about what is the wisest thing to do.  There would be no need to convene a council every time two believers have different opinions, neither should we expect that believers will never have different opinions on a matter.

What were their arguments?  We are not told, but it isn’t to hard to supply a general sense of what they are.  Barnabas as a “son of encouragement” wants to give John Mark a second chance, so that he can learn to persevere in the Lord.  Of course, this definitely harmonizes with the fact that the Gospel is all about giving sinners redemption when they don’t deserve it.

Of course, Paul may come back with the reality that they are going into territory where people have tried to kill them.  They need people who can be trusted on the journey, and who are full of faith, not fear.  He could even remind Barnabas of the words of our Lord that a man who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is not fit for the kingdom of God.  John Mark can be a believer who is saved, but Paul probably sees him as a man who has shown himself unfit for ministry.

Both arguments have some biblical wisdom to them.  I’m reminded of the classical problem with wisdom in the proverbs.  Proverbs 26, verses 4 and 5, first tell a person not to rebuke a fool, and then tell them to rebuke a fool.  It seems contradictory, but that is how wisdom is.  Sometimes it is wise to rebuke a fool and sometimes it is not.  Wisdom is knowing when you do one or the other.  The same thing is true in this case with Barnabas and Paul.  There is a time to give people a second chance in ministry, and there is a time to pass on letting a person back into ministry (at least with you).  Of course, wisdom is knowing when.  Let’s not lose sight that we should always pray in situations like this for God’s wisdom.

It is important to see that God was quite capable of giving a direction to both of these men.  We might fault them for not seeking God’s answer, but that may not be what the Holy Spirit is showing us.  Neither man abused their gift of prophecy by declaring that God was on their side.  At least, they had the spiritual maturity to recognize that God was leaving it up to them.

As a matter of wisdom, we might recognize that later Paul will accept John Mark as a faithful minister that is “useful” to him (2 Timothy 4:11).  However, he doesn’t say that he was wrong in his earlier decision, only that Mark is now useful to him.

Sometimes it may just be that God uses our differences of personality and opinions to lead us in different directions.  Barnabas will take John Mark and go to Cyprus.  Clearly, this was instrumental in helping John Mark to become a trustworthy leader.  Paul on the other hand will take Silas and go north by land through Syria and into Cilicia where his hometown Tarsus was.

Maybe Paul was too hard, and maybe Barnabas was too soft.  We can note, however, that now there are two missionary teams working at the same time, instead of just one.  Perhaps, in going separate ways, they could best understand what God was saying to each one of them.

We should be careful about always expecting agreement on what Christ would have us do, and that Christ will always give a word of wisdom to settle every dispute.  Sometimes the Holy Spirit is silent in order to see what we will do and how we will handle it.  It can be a test, but don’t think of it as pass or fail.  God is willing to go down the path with both sides of this disagreement.

We can also second guess our past choices and decisions because of what we experience.  Be careful of that.  Paul being stoned in Lystra says nothing about whether he heard from God or not to go there.  In the end, we will have made a lot of decisions that may or may not have been wise.  Yet, the most important point is whether or not we are looking to the Lord Jesus to help us to grow to be more like him.  If we keep our eyes upon Jesus, then the Holy Spirit will help us and our overall course will have been wise (trusting Jesus) over the top of any “unwise” decisions along the way.

Dwelling in unity is more about dwelling in The One who is the perfect unity.  If we will do that, then he will help us to reconcile with one another, without having to completely agree about every opinion and decision.

May God help us to dwell in unity by the help of his Holy Spirit!

Unity audio

The Acts of the Apostles 60

Subtitle: The Jerusalem Council III

Acts 15:22-29.  This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on October 22, 2023.

We will finish up our look at the Jerusalem Council, which took place between A.D. 48 to 50.  The decision of this original group should settle the issue of what is required for Gentile salvation because it has the apostles trained by Jesus, as well as the elders and people who witnessed the life, ministry and resurrection of Jesus.  Yet, it is amazing how many ways through the years individuals and theologians of the Church have come up with to go wrong on this issue of salvation.

Down through the ages to our time, Church councils haven’t always done us a favor.  The further you move forward in time from the resurrection of Jesus, the more we see such councils supplanting Scripture with human reasoning.  It may even lead some to see such councils as a mistake, and against the will of God.  Yet, here we have a council set in the Word of God, and it is clear that it is a good thing for the Church.

The problem is not in convening a council to determine what the truth is in a matter, and what should be taught.   When you look through the history of these councils, you will always find an individual, or group, who are pushing a teaching that is new, or novel.  This creates turmoil among the churches as people deal with the confusion that new teaching brings.  They want to know what the truth actually is.  In Acts 15, that problem, or teaching, is the idea that Gentiles have to be circumcised and follow the Law of Moses in order to be saved.  Believing in Christ and following him by faith was not enough for them, and it began to cause trouble.

Leaders can cause trouble, but sometimes trouble percolates up through the group and leaders have to step in for the sake of group cohesion.  This is normal and good, if it is done correctly and in the right spirit.  These leaders job is not to determine what is best for the group, but rather to determine what the Lord Jesus is saying through the Holy Spirit.  Thus, we should have some mercy on the generations that convened councils, and stick to criticizing only the decisions, and reasoning behind them.

Thus, you will notice that this first council becomes a good template for how councils should operate.  The people should gather, look to what the Spirit is doing, and what the Scriptures say.  Even then, if we are not actually seeking God like we should, if we are not living in communion with Jesus through the Spirit, our fleshly approach to truth will not follow the Spirit of God, no matter how much we protest that we followed the template.  It is not a scientific formula.  It is a relationship with Jesus.

At the base of errors in doctrine are at least two persuasions.  We can over emphasize the role of human reasoning in coming to truth, even elevating a group or man as the ones, one, who have a sanctified mind for the group.  The more human reasoning is the foundation of our beliefs the more we will be off-track.  The other persuasion is that we can ignore reasoning, and the reasoning of God’s proven Word in Scripture.  This persuasion over-emphasizes the spiritual ability to know truth of the leader, or leaders.  It shuts down all debate because “I have the mind of the Lord and don’t have to answer your critiques.”

Let us recognize that God is the One who gave us our minds.  He does intend us to use them.  However, our minds are not capable of assessing truth in these spiritual matters without God’s help.  At the best, our minds can only help us discern what God is showing us is the truth.  Even then, our reasoning is fraught with pitfalls, and humility is the order of the day.  The Lord has given us a foundation of His thinking in the Old Testament and the New Testament.  We need to take seriously their importance as well as the importance of what the Holy Spirit is doing now.  This will help to guard us from going into error.

Let’s look at our passage.

A letter is sent to the church in Antioch (v. 22-29)

We noted last week that it was James who had brought up the idea of sending a letter addressed to Antioch and the Gentile churches beyond them concerning this debated issue (v. 20).  This is exactly what they do.

Thus, we end up with a decision from a group of people at a particular point in time, and we also end up with a written record.  Paul and Barnabas will be able to tell what happened in Jerusalem, but there will also be an address from the church in Jerusalem describing things from their perspective.

We do not know if they had a vote, or people simply quit arguing against the truths that are recorded here.  Yet, they did come to an agreement, and create a letter, which Luke inserted in his Acts of the Apostles.  It is a good thing too because this is how we end up with the actual wording of the letter established for all time.  The church at Antioch was over-run in the 600’s by Muslims, and the original document is lost to us.

Three times in this passage (v. 22, 25, and 28), we have a word that is variously translated as “it pleased…,” or “it seemed good to…”  It is a word that has a range of certainty connected to it, from judging that something is certainly true, all the way to believing that something has a good probability of being true.  I think this passage the council was pretty certain that they had determined the mind of God on this matter.  They were not just giving their best guess, or sheer human reasoning on the matter.

In verse 22, we have listed that the apostles, elders, and the whole church were in on the decision.  The decision and plan to send a letter seemed good to all of them.

The judges in the Old Testament were not supposed to imagine the best solution for a case.  Rather, they were supposed to render the decision of the LORD.  Of course, they would look to what the Law said on a matter, but they would also seek wisdom from God’s Spirit- that is if they had a heart for God.  The Scriptures and the Holy Spirit help God’s people to understand truth when they are truthfully seeking it. 

You may also recognize that there is no sense in the story that an approach is being ramrodded through by leaders.  Even Paul and Barnabas are quite subdued in Luke’s account, only giving testimony to what the Spirit was doing among Gentiles.  I believe that they exercised wisdom to let the Jerusalem church come to a decision without undue pressure from them.  It was important that God showed them the truth.

We can be guilty today of practicing the leadership style of the world.  We can learn how to manipulate the stupid sheep to do what we know they need to do.  It is stylish to build forums and means for the little people to feel like they had a say and participated in the process, but in the end, the group will end up at a pre-decided decision that was made by the ultra-smart leaders.  Such manipulative activity is not of the Spirit of God and is not a proper, godly way to come to decisions.  Of course, this about sums up our politics, and many of our churches in the land.

Praise God that this is not what happened back in Acts 15 at the Jerusalem Council.

In verse 25 it mentions in the letter that “It seemed good to us, being assembled in one accord.”  There is that word again.  They were in one accord.  They had a singular passion for determining what God would have them believe and teach.  They wanted to rightly represent the Lord Jesus, since they were subjected to persecution by people who assumed that they had the corner of the market on representing God.

Many have a singular passion alright, a singular passion for their own way.  If we gather in a group and everyone is fighting passionately for their own way, then we will never have a true spiritual unity.  However, even if we are manipulated into a decision that everyone agrees to, it is not a unity of the spirit, but a unity of the flesh that is guaranteed to breakdown along the way.

We lastly recognize that verse 28 mentions that “it seemed good to the Holy Spirit…”  Of course, God is absolutely sure what the right thing is.  There is no range of certainty when it comes to Him.  The seeming is all on the human side of this equation.  They had come to the conclusion that this is what the Spirit of God was teaching them.  Yet, they are being humble enough to recognize the fact that their reasoning was involved in this process.  Unity must always center upon God’s decisions, and leaders, churches, ought to be very humble in any such process.

They determine that it would be best to send some men along with the letter.  This would give the Jerusalem Church some official representation along with the letter, not that they would doubt the veracity of how Paul and Barnabas portrayed the council to the church of Antioch.  Yet, the original issue had to do with men who had come from Judea, but did not officially represent the church.  The bad experience they had with the earlier Judaizers could be overcome with the good experience of the true, official representatives sent with the letter.

The first of the two men listed is Judas, also called Barsabas.  This is the only time that this individual is mentioned in the New Testament.  The second name helps us to differentiate him from other men with the name Judas (Judah in Hebrew) like Judas Iscariot, or Judas, also called Thaddeus, or Judas (Jude) the brother of our Lord.

The second man listed is Silas.  He is going to become one of the men who helped Paul in his missionary journeys to come.  He will faithfully minister with Paul to the Gentiles.  He is always referred to as Silas in the book of Acts.  However, in his letters, the apostle Paul calls him Silvanus.  Silus is just a shortened form of Silvanus.

What were the qualifications of these men?  They were leading men from among the Jerusalem church.  They had risked their lives for the Gospel (v. 26), which means that they had a vested interest in promoting the true Gospel.  Also, in verse 32, we will later see that they are both prophets, and able to spiritually minister to the group in Antioch.

Luke gives us a word for word copy of the letter starting at verse 23.  It starts out by clarifying that the men, who had “troubled” them about following the Law of Moses, were not sent by Jerusalem.  I am sure that the intent is not only to state the truth for the record, but also to restore goodwill between Antioch and them.  The Jerusalem church had never been behind the attempt to trouble them on this matter.  Yet, they are helping to make things right because of the presence of the apostles of Jesus in their city, as well as many elders who had close connection to the ministry of Jesus.  They have a responsibility to the rest of the Church.

Some point to the words of Paul in Galatians 2:12.  They interpret them to believe that James was at least a stickler for Jews continuing to obey the Law of Moses, which would include separation from Gentiles.  To whatever degree James believed this, something was behind Peter’s change of attitude about eating with Gentiles when “men from James” arrived in Antioch.  We do not know exactly when the Galatians 2 incident happened.  Was it before or after this council?  From the words said and the decision made, you would think that it would have to be before..  However, we do not know for sure.

It is believed that some confusion on what Jews needed to do, may have lead to some over-zealous teaching on what Gentiles needed to do.  Regardless, the decision in the letter is quite clear.  Gentiles do not need to follow the Law of Moses.  Although the Church had never officially taught that Gentiles needed to obey the Law of Moses in order to be saved, it did take about 18 years for the Church to denounce the idea officially.

In fact, close attention to Peter’s testimony will even clarify salvation for Jews.  He questions in verse 10, “Why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?”  Also, he said in verse 11 that “we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved in the same manner as they.”  Earlier he had described that manner as “by faith.”  This council didn’t just hammer out the means of salvation for Gentiles, but for Jews as well.  Even Jews do not need to follow the Law of Moses in order to be saved by Jesus.

The letter next declares that two men named Judas and Silas are accompanying the letter.  This is a first-century security mechanism for validation.

Finally, the letter stipulates the three issues that were being prohibited to the Gentiles (and Jews).  They were to abstain from things offered to idols, abstain from eating or drinking blood (things strangled still have blood in the meet), and they were to abstain from sexual immorality.  They are referred to as necessary, and yet, it simply says that if they will restrain themselves from doing these things that they will “do well.”  It is a burden being placed upon the Gentiles, but no heavy burden as Peter called the Law of Moses.

This is not only wisdom, but also obvious.  If you are following Jesus, then all hint of following idols and the things associated with idolatry needs to drop off.  You cannot have loyal faith in Jesus and still remain attached to idols and idolatry.  This loyalty issue has trust and faith at its core.

The blood issue was addressed last week, but would help Jews and Gentiles within the Church to be able to get along with one another.  Plus, it would retain a clear line around the subject of how we obtain life and power.  The pagans ate and drank animal blood for ritualistic reasons connected to their idols.  Jesus is our source of life, and our sacrifice now.

Lastly, we are told in the New Testament in many places to flee sexual immorality.  The moral components of the Law of Moses are reiterated by the apostles throughout the New Testament and Christians need to obey them, not because we are following the Law of Moses, but rather, because we are following Jesus Christ and His apostles who laid down these necessary things to avoid and necessary things to do.

Let me close by revisiting this issue of dead works versus works of faith.  We can fall into two extremes if we are not careful.  On one hand, we can be so against “dead works” and working for salvation that we promote doing nothing, even sinning.  However, on the other hand, we can be so intent against sin that we make a long list of things people have to do in order to be truly saved.

We need to go back to the Word of God.  What does it say is necessary for salvation?  It is to believe in Jesus, to put our trust in Him.  We then follow Jesus, who gave us the apostles and the Holy Spirit, and they gave us the New Testament.

This calls for humility in any issue.  I can be wrong and should not stir up trouble within a church.  Yet, whole churches and denominations can be wrong because they have inherited a system that has error riddled within it.  Only Jesus can save us, and it calls for faithful, courageous trust in Jesus, both to save us and to help us come to the knowledge of the truth.

None of us can do enough to save ourselves.  We can only put our faith upon Jesus.  However, once Jesus has accepted my faith and put me in a safe place, I can do good works that are clean before God.  What makes them clean?  They are clean because they are not done out of the selfish reason to make ourselves look good to God.  Rather, they are done out of thanks to Jesus for salvation and the belief, the faith, that He is helping us to become like God through the works He leads us to do by His Word and by His Spirit.

So, when you help people, or go to church on any particular day, and you do it because you love Christ and want to honor him, it can be a clean work acceptable unto God and makes you more like Jesus.  However, if I do these things because I believe I have to do these things to achieve my way into heaven, then they become dead works.  They are not really done in Christ by the Spirit, but in the flesh.

May God help us to come alive to Jesus by the Help of the Holy Spirit in order to do the works that He has created us to do.  “For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.”  (Ephesians 2:10).

Jerusalem Counsel III Audio

The Acts of the Apostles 59

Subtitle: The Jerusalem Council II

Acts 15:13-21.  This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on October 15, 2023.

We continue to look at the gathering in which the First-Century Church settled the question on what Gentiles had to do in order to be saved.

Let’s make it clear that the Church and its leaders do not have the authority to promote anything but what God is saying and doing.  The Church is not a business that Jesus started and current leaders can choose to do something different.  Salvation is not a product that we can tweak in order to be more profitable, or any other human aspiration.

In reality, the leaders in this gathering were seeking to discern and come to agreement upon what the Lord Jesus wanted them to do and to teach.

This is an important distinction because, when you look at the history of the Church, you will find that over time leaders began to look more to human reasoning to lead them than to the Word of God and the leading of the Holy Spirit.

Like ambassadors of a great king, we are to rightly represent Him to the world.  This is important in general, but it is especially important to those who are responding to the Gospel of Jesus.  We do not want to be guilty of misleading those whom God plans to save.

Last week, we looked at Peter’s testimony, and then we looked at the testimony of Barnabas and Paul.  Now we are going to look at the testimony of James, the brother of the Lord.

Let’s look at our passage.

They gather to make a decision: James’s testimony (v. 13 -21)

Luke only gives the name of James without any other description.  This is not the apostle James, the brother of John, sons of Zebedee.  James was put to death by Herod Agrippa I in Acts 12:2.  He was the first of the apostles to die, and his brother was apparently the last (separated by around 45 years or so).

This could make us question God.  Why?

There is a certain amount of testing that we all need, and yet there are also a variety of the kinds of witness and testimony that we can be.  Sometimes God simply lets certain things happen and play out as people intend, and yet other times He has something more specific that He wants to happen, so He intervenes.

We must be careful of thinking God will always part the Red Sea if a person really knows Him, or if He is really involved in a matter.  Of course, God can do a dramatic miracle any time He pleases.  Yet, we can take a clue from the New Testament story of the resurrection of Lazarus.  Four days after he died and was buried, Jesus showed up and miraculously raised him from the dead.  Yet, even Lazarus came to death’s door a second time and Jesus didn’t come down from heaven to raise him up.  There were probably a few people keeping watch for at least 4 days, just in case. 

Yet, Jesus didn’t show up.  Why not?  Our inheritance is not living in a mortal body forever.  Lazarus had lived a full life and it was time for him to rest from his Gospel labor, and enter into the joys of the Lord.

My main point is that we can over promote the miraculous, or the providence  of how long we live.  Israel’s problem was never that they didn’t have enough miracles.  Their problem was walking in faith with God after the miracle.  In fact, that is not just Israel’s problem, but a human problem.  In fact, we often have trouble trusting God even as He is doing the miraculous in our lives. 

God does miracles from time to time, but the longer period is walking in trusting faith in between.  The tension of having an impossible mission is punctuated by God showing up from time to time in amazing ways.  Yet, we need to walk in faith regardless.

Tradition has always held that this is the half-brother of Jesus, though there are some groups that try to make out that Mary did not have any other kids after Jesus.  The record shows that Joseph was not a biological father to Jesus (the Holy Spirit created a child within Mary).  Yet, he and Mary did have children later:  James, Jude, Joses, and others.  None of the brothers of Jesus believed in him until after the resurrection.  Once they believed, they quickly became pillars in the Jerusalem church.

The only place in the Bible where it mentions that James was a brother of Jesus is in Galatians 1:19.  James, who wrote the book of James, never calls himself the brother of the Lord.  He calls himself, “James, a bondservant [slave] of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ…”

For some people that was big doings.  But, Paul makes the point in Galatians 1 through 2 that such is not important before God.  James is not taking the place of Jesus, as if he were in a line of succession.  No man will ever succeed the Lord Jesus who reigns forever and ever.

James starts out by referencing the testimony of Peter.  It is clear that James agrees with Peter’s conclusions and that his purpose is to give supporting evidence and then offer a solution.  He mentions in verse 14 that Peter had described how God had visited the Gentiles in order to take out of them a people for His name.  This helps us to see what James is focusing on, Gentiles belonging to Yahweh like Israel did.

It is interesting that Peter’s testimony focuses upon the power and work of the Holy Spirit in teaching him, and powerfully working among the Gentiles through him.  He gives testimony to the supernatural move of God, and is very practical, focused on activity of the Spirit of God.

The testimony of James is more theological, and looks to Scripture.  Most likely, James did not have any visions himself.  We are not told whether Jesus appeared to him during the 40 days following the resurrection.  Regardless, James knows the Scriptures, and he sees a connection between Scripture and what Peter is saying.

First James points out that the words of the prophets (plural) agree with this idea of the Gentiles becoming a people belonging to God.  James is going to quote one of those prophets, but the verse he is going to quote is merely representative of a large number of other places he could have gone to and quoted.  He could have mentioned God’s promise to Abram that through him the nations would be blessed.  He could have quoted Moses telling Israel that God would make them jealous through a foolish nation.  He could have quoted Isaiah saying that the death of God’s servant would be to precious to only redeem Israel, but that he would also become a light to the Gentiles.

However, James thinks of Amos 9:11-12.  This passage clearly pictures the Gentiles being called by the name of the LORD.

By the way, in general, quotes of the Old Testament that are given in the New Testament are clearly from a Greek translation called the Septuagint that was made in the 200’s BC. (also designated as LXX for the 70 scholars who worked on the project),  Long story short, there are sometimes where the LXX differs from the Old Testament texts in Hebrew that the Pharisees maintained from the first century down to now.  The reality is that not everyone read and wrote in Hebrew.  The Bibles of the early Church were the LXX and Greek copies of the Gospels and Letters of the Apostles.  These were later translated into Syriac and Latin, among other languages.  Even though there may be some differences in word choice between the LXX and the oldest Hebrew manuscript that we have, those differences do not change anything that is essential.

I bring this up because Amos 9:11-12 has a few differences from the LXX.  We will deal with them as we come to them.

Amos first talks about the fallen tabernacle of David.  God will raise it back up and repair its damage.  What is this tabernacle of David?  Moses had built a tabernacle, a tent, to house the ark of the covenant.  This was used by Israel in the desert and brought into the promised land.  The tabernacle was set up in a few different places, but Shiloh becomes the main place from the time of Joshua to Samuel.  Eli’s sons try to use the ark of the covenant as a talisman against the Philistines, and it is captured in a defeat.  At the same time, Eli falls and dies.   This appears to taint the place of Shiloh, so the tabernacle is moved to Gibeon, but the ark never returns to it. 

David wanted to build a temple, but God would not let him.  His son would do it.  Thus, David put up a temporary tent in Jerusalem in order to house the ark until the temple was finished.  This would be the closest thing to a literal tabernacle of David.  However, the temple replaced this tent.  It is quite clear that this is not about raising up a literal tent that had belonged to David.

This is where we must recognize that God used a word play in 2 Samuel 7 when he told David that he could not build the temple.  Instead of David building a house (temple) for the Lord, God would build a house (dynasty) for David.  In fact, one of the offspring of David would be a son to God and God would be a father to him.  This son would inherit a forever kingdom and restore Israel.  The prophets all picked up on this theme of a Messianic Son of David who would raise up Israel and subdue the Gentiles.  However, God continued to add more to these prophecies.  The main point is that the “tabernacle of David” had fallen a long time ago.  The last Davidic king was taken out by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC.  No Son of David sat on a throne over Israel for the last 600 years.  This is what is meant by a broken down and ruined tabernacle.  Who could raise up such a thing?  Only Messiah.

James clearly sees the raising up of Jesus as a fulfillment of this raising up of the tent of David.  Though Jesus was not ruling in Jerusalem, he is at the right hand of the Father awaiting the day in which it is time to make his enemies his footstool (Psalm 110).  The line of David had been restored, and the glorified Jesus can never die again.  He is both the restarting, and the true end of the Line of David.

This leads to the second part of the prophecy in Amos.  The broken tent is raised up in order to “possess the remnant…all the Gentiles who are called by My [the LORD’s] name.”  There is a question on whether it is the remnant of Edom or the remnant of Adam (i.e., humanity).  Hebrew originally had no vowels and they have the same consonants.  However, because there is a parallelism here, the next phrase that is not in question settles it, “the Gentiles” are intended.  Since we end up in the same place (the Gentiles), I am not too worried about whether Amos 9:12 should read “the remnant of Edom,” or “the remnant of mankind.”  Both ultimately say the same thing.

The next issue is to notice that in Amos the tabernacle of David is raised up to possess the remnant, and the quote from James says that the tabernacle is raised up “so that the rest of mankind may seek the LORD.”  This may seem to be contradictory at first, but give me a second and I will show you that they are two sides of the same coin.

Notice that the Messiah coming forth would both raise up the line of David, but also have an impact on the Gentiles.  Let’s start with the verb possess.  The Messiah would possess, or take possession of, the remnant of the Gentiles.  A remnant is always a small faithful group in the midst of a larger group that is not.  It can also mean a small group that survive a judgment of God, and thus are the blessed of the LORD.  We should also notice that the second part of Amos 9:12 is that the remnant are “called by My name.”  Who is the ruling Messiah of Israel?  It is Jesus who even now is possessing the remnant of the Gentiles and will possess the remnant of those who miraculously survive the Great Tribulation.

The point is that “possess” does not essentially mean to stomp on, destroy, dominate, or tyrannize.    It essentially means to inherit.  It is not a negative thing for the Gentiles here, it is a positive thing.  How does the Bible describe Gentiles (and Jews) as a possession of God?  We are called a “Treasured Possession,” also “Jewels.”  The flip side to Jesus inheriting the remnant of the Gentiles concerns what it takes to be part of the remnant.  Those who are seeking salvation and believe on Jesus become his possession.  Thus, to possess and to seek are merely two sides of the same revelation.  There is both seeking and possessing going on. 

Basically James is saying that the Bible prophesies what Peter is describing.

Then, James says, “Known to God from eternity are all His works.”  In a sense, this is not a new thing to God.  It may seem shocking and surprising to them, but God had been planning and leading up to this moment long before He even laid the foundations of the earth.

Again, James cannot be clearer that he agrees with Peter that they are seeing the prophesied move of God to take a people for Himself from among the Gentiles.  It is also good to see the Church working together paying attention to what the Spirit of God is doing now, and also what the Scriptures say, i.e., the sure and proven work of the Holy Spirit in the past.  We can become off-base when we emphasize one over the other.  We need both working together because the same Holy Spirit is behind both.

At this point, James puts forward a solution, or resolution in verse 19.  He says, “I judge…”  Some people read far more than they should into this.  James is not giving a decision for the whole group.  This could just as easily be interpreted as “I opine (it is my opinion)…”  James has made up his mind and is completely convinced by the evidence.  There are two main aspects to the resolution that James puts forth.

He determines that Jewish believers should not trouble the Gentile believers who are turning to God.  Essentially, he is referring to requiring them to obey the Law of Moses.  Troubling those who are turning to God, or have already turned to God, is something that we would associate with the wicked, and not God’s righteous people.  Though the terminology of James is not as dire as Peter’s (“why do you test God putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples…”), he still uses a disparaging term, “trouble.”

Troubling people who are coming to faith in Jesus can be a problem for the Church today.  We can try to stipulate things that God never commanded.  However, some groups seem to believe it is troubling people to put the commands of the Lord Jesus Christ and His apostles before them.  We should say no more and no less than what the New Testament puts before us.

The wicked do not realize the danger they are in when they trouble God’s people.  In truth, they bring trouble upon themselves and will perish in the way if they do not repent.

The second part of James’ resolution is to write to the Gentiles that they abstain from three things.  It lists four, but two of them are two aspects of the same issue.  He believes that Gentiles should only be told to abstain from things polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from eating things strangled, and from ingesting blood.

Why these three things and where is James getting this?  Some see a connection to Leviticus 17 and 18.  In this section, God recognizes that there will be people who are not Israelites living among them.  He does not require them to follow all the Law of Moses if they are going to live among His people, but He does place some prohibitions upon them.  Leviticus 17 brings up the issue of idolatry.  If they want to do a sacrifice, it can only be at the tabernacle, and it can only be a sacrifice to Yahweh.    All of Leviticus 18 deals with the sexual immorality that was rampant among the Canaanites.  No foreigner who lived in Israel was to be involved in any sexual immorality.  Lastly, Leviticus 17 talks about blood issues.  The pagans often drank blood and used blood in their rituals as a way of gaining power and life.  For Israel, the blood of the animals was closely associated to the offerings before Yahweh.  He commanded them not to eat meat with the blood still in it, which would also prohibit straight out drinking blood.  Strangulation does not allow an animal to bleed out, which causes the blood to coagulate in the vessels and tissue of the animal.  No foreigner was to eat meat that had not been properly drained of its blood.

Coming back to James, he ties these prohibitions in verse 21 to the fact that Moses has been preached in many cities throughout many generations.  Though some differ as to how this is a “because” to the prohibitions, I believe that it has to do with Gentiles coming to the Lord being around Jewish people.  The Church is going to grow and expand into cities where there are Jews who need Jesus too.  Perhaps, James sees this as wisely removing some barriers to Jews and Gentiles coming into the Church together.  The Gentiles would not be trying to keep the Law, and the Jews could see God’s word instructing the minimum that they need to do.

Regardless of whether this is all how James thought about it, there is more than one way to support abstaining from anything associated with idols, sexual immorality and eating/drinking blood.  Simply following the “Law of Love” will teach you that sexual immorality is a selfish way of life that brings great sorrow into relationships, families, and societies.  The moral issues of the Old Testament were all reiterated by God’s apostles in the New Testament and are binding upon the believer today.  I don’t have to go to the Law of Moses to know and believe that God does not want me to murder, and if I do, I will not be right before Him.

We will finish this next week, but let me end with this.  We have the same Word of God, and the same Holy  Spirit today.  Yes, many denominations and leaders in the Church have made ungodly decisions throughout history.  However, we must not let that sidetrack us from looking to God and seeking His leading.  We can throw up our hands saying that “it doesn’t work anymore!”  Or, “God doesn’t care.”  Yet, we would be wrong.  God cares deeply and is always ready at every moment to lead us by His Spirit.  It is we who become hurt, apathetic, and uncaring about seeking Him.  May God help us to be a people of the Word who are also seeking the leading of the Holy Spirit.  If we will do this, then He will lead us forward and help us to reach others.

Council II audio