The Gifts of the Holy Spirit- 3

1 Corinthians 14:1-19.  This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on Sunday, June 14, 2026.

Having explained in chapter thirteen the importance of love as a permanent foundation to everything that we do as followers of Jesus, Paul now turns back to the issue of spiritual gifts and the abuses happening within the Christian gatherings in Corinth.

Chapter twelve introduced Paul’s teaching on spiritual gifts in general.  He ended that chapter with the instruction to zealously desire the greater gifts.  This statement in and of itself is not problematic to the Corinthians.  They would believe that they were seeking “the greater gifts.”  However, Paul is setting up why their fascination with speaking in tongues is a misunderstanding of what actually makes a spiritual gift greater than another.

This is why chapter thirteen may feel like it is disjointed.  Paul lays the groundwork of why love for God and others must direct our choices in the area of spiritual gifts before he comes back to spiritual gifts in chapter fourteen, where he explains why tongues is not the greater gift compared to prophecy.

Let’s look at our passage.

The need for intelligibility in the assembly of believers (v. 1-5)

Chapter fourteen narrows its focus to the spiritual gifts of speaking in tongues and prophesying because this is where the trouble was occurring in the Corinthian church.

His main concern is that speaking gifts that are exercised within the assembly of believers (i.e., during a church service) should be intelligible, understandable, to those gathered so that they can be spiritually edified.

We should not let our modern concept of church gatherings cloud our understanding of this.  A Christian gathering is not about the building.  It can be in a home, in a cave, or out in the jungle.  Regardless, when believers are gathered to worship God and encourage one another in the faith, the emphasis must be on the ability of people to understand the language of what is being said.

We should also note that Paul does not argue that the Corinthian believers do not have the Holy Spirit or that the gifts they are exercising are not legitimate.  Rather, his argument is that they are abusing them or using them in a way that is grievous to the Holy Spirit who is enabling them in their lives.

Paul opens up with tying chapter twelve and thirteen together with twin imperatives.  They are to pursue love while also zealously desiring spiritual gifts, especially that you may prophesy (rather than speak in tongues).

Please note that he uses the same verb, zealously desire, for spiritual gifts in chapter twelve and fourteen.  However, he chooses a different verb for love; pursue love.  This can be pictured as always chasing after something that is illusively out of grasp, but the better picture is that of a pathway or, even better, the person of Jesus Christ himself.  The love of Christ is always before us as an example and guide.  We must make that our aim and pursuit while exercising (or desiring) spiritual gifts.

Verse 1 also answers the question that Paul has set up at the end of chapter twelve.  What is the greater spiritual gift?  Prophecy is the greater gift within the assembly of believers.  You could also add any other word of wisdom, knowledge, etc. that is given in a language that the people understand.

In verse two Paul begins to describe some differences between speaking in tongues and prophesying.  A person who speaks in tongues speaks to God not man (v. 2).  No one understands him, and he speaks mysteries (i.e., no one understands what he is saying).  A person who speaks in tongues also edifies themselves (v. 4).  All of this can be changed if the message in tongues is interpreted for the people in attendance.  The interpretation would then be addressing the people (not God), and it would be understandable to them.  The message in tongues that is interpreted will also be able to edify the whole church.  At that point, speaking in tongues with interpretation would be functionally equivalent to prophecy.

Comparatively, a person who prophesies speaks to the people and they can understand them.  The prophecy is given to edify the whole body and not just the speaker.  Paul gives three examples of the way that prophecy can help the church: edification (build them up to be like Jesus), exhortation (whether commands or encouragements), and lastly consolation.  Paul sees these three aspects in the purpose of prophecy.

Analogies that argue for intelligibility (v. 6-12)

Verse six restates the problem in a personal way.  Paul again resorts to putting himself in the position that the Corinthian mindset would encourage.  “If I come to you speaking in tongues,” this implies if he only did this, like the Corinthians liked to do.  Paul asks how this would be able to benefit them.  It would only be profitable if he spoke a language that was intelligible, whether a revelation, knowledge, prophecy or teaching.

Thus, Paul is emphasizing that intelligibility allows for people to be built up in the faith and character of Christ.  The profit here is spiritual profit.

Paul then points to areas of life where the principle of intelligibility is necessary.  In verse seven, he speaks of a flute or a harp.  Music requires a distinction of tones in order to produce a pleasing sound as opposed to a raucous noise.

In verse 8, he moves to a bugle.  This was used in the military to quickly direct men.  Particular tunes were used to get men out of bed, or to warn of attack, etc.  If the bugler does not clearly blow the right notes, it would confuse the men and leave them open to danger.

In verses ten and eleven, Paul speaks of foreign languages around the world.  The message encoded in each language is real but is also inaccessible to a person who does not understand it.  I am a foreigner to them, and they are a foreigner to me.  The term “barbarian” was a Greek term that mimicked the sounds of a foreigner “bar bar bar” and became barbaros or barbarian in English.

If you were in a group that knew you did not speak a different language, but they kept speaking it among themselves, the result is that you would feel not only left out but also pushed out.  Paul makes the point that an unknown language makes you a foreigner to the speaker.  We will be isolated from one another and limited in our ability to work together or help one another.

Christians are to be a new people.  We don’t all necessarily have the same native language, but we speak a common language in order to accomplish the purpose of God with one another.

These examples all highlight the importance of intelligibility when it comes to the verbal spiritual gifts in church gatherings.

Paul ends this section in verse twelve by calling the Corinthians who are zealous of spiritual gifts also “to seek to abound for the edification of the church.”  In other words, they should exercise them for the greater purpose of God, building up believers to be more like Jesus.

They should not be zealous for a spiritual gift as a status symbol.  They should not settle for everyone edifying themselves (everyone for themselves) when they are gathered together.

The Corinthians may have imagined that everyone was being edified in the church when they were all speaking in tongues.  However, Paul will now move to explain the purpose of tongues versus the purpose of prophecy.

Application to the believing community (v. 13-19)

Paul now moves to describe how tongues and prophecy should be exercised within our gatherings.  The first application is that the person who speaks in tongues should pray for its interpretation.  He doesn’t make clear if this is before speaking or after speaking.  The main point is not to settle for continuing in tongues without interpreting the message.  The onus is put upon the person who believes they have a message in tongues to give.  We should leave room for churches to discover in trial and error just who in the may or may not have the spiritual gift of interpretation.  Regardless, it would eventually be clear whether someone is present that is used in that way by the Spirit.

In verse fourteen, Paul describes praying in tongues, which is addressed to God, as praying with your spirit.  This is placed next to the idea of praying with your mind, which is praying in a language you understand.

When you pray with your spirit, i.e., in tongues, your mind is “unfruitful” (there is no intellectual benefit) other than the knowledge that the Spirit of God is enabling your spirit to talk with God in an unknown language.

Verse 15 includes singing in this.  To sing with my spirit is to sing in tongues, and to sing with my mind is to sing in a language I understand.

Praying with your mind is important, and most people can understand this.  However, how does praying with your spirit build you up?  It teaches you how to trust the Holy Spirit and have confidence that God knows what your spirit is saying.  It gives you a comfort in knowing that the Holy Spirit is helping you to pray to the Father.

Some may refuse such things, declaring that they will only be edified through their mind.  This seems to be a short-sighted and selfish attitude.  God knows what we need.  Why would we shut off any help that He wants to provide?

In verse sixteen, Paul questions how someone can say, “Amen,” in the assembly to something that they do not understand.  They are called “the uninformed” (some versions have “ungifted,” but this seems to be more of an interpretation).  This could be a reference to non-believers, or it could be believers who are not taught in regard to spiritual gifts (or simply don’t have the gift of interpretation).  However, it seems most likely that this is a reference to those who are uninformed in the Gospel.  How will they hear the truth and believe (say amen) if it is not in a language they understand?

Paul may even be saying that you are turning your fellow Christians into those who are uninformed by the fact that they don’t know what you are saying.  The point is that they are left out of any meaningful interaction with what is being done.

Of course, Paul is not putting tongues down.  He says in verse eighteen that he speaks in tongues more than all of them.  However, he apparently does the lion’s share of his tongue speaking when he is by himself (in personal times of prayer).  Five intelligible words are worth more than 10,000 words in tongues that are unknown.

There is a modern contention among some that there should be no tongues at all in churches today.  Yet, the Bible tells us to desire spiritual gifts because it is God who desires to work them through us for the good of the body of Christ.  We should follow love and follow the Spirit because they are one and the same.

Second, we should not let fear cause us to shrink back from spiritual gifts.  We should trust God and exercise them properly for the benefit of all who are attending, not just for ourselves.

We will stop here today and pick up later.

Gifts of the Holy Spirit 3 audio

The Gifts of the Holy Spirit- 2

1 Corinthians 13. This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on Sunday, June 7, 2026.

This chapter is most generally known as the Love Chapter, and it is true that it describes the love of Christ and how the Holy Spirit seeks to express it in our lives.

However, this chapter is specifically about how the love of Christ should impact our exercise of spiritual gifts.  Thus, it is a specific application of how the love of Christ impacts this area of our lives. 

We should even see that it is part of a corrective teaching that shows how the love of Christ can be used to redirect abusive activity in any area of our lives.

Chapter 12 ended with two notions.  First, Paul wanted the Corinthians to recognize that speaking in tongues is not the greater gift, as they thought.  Prophecy is a greater gift than it.  However, in order for them to understand why it is greater, they must understand the “more excellent way” of the love of Christ.

Let’s look at our passage.

The necessity of love with spiritual gifts (v. 1-3)

Paul starts with the spiritual gift that the Corinthians valued most, speaking in tongues.  He could make this same point by using them as the hypothetical person, but instead, Paul uses himself.  “If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels…”  This is to soften the hard statements that he is going to make.

Of course, all of our speech should spring forth from a heart full of God’s love.  It is a necessity for the disciple of Jesus.  However, Paul is correcting them on their use of spiritual gifts, especially speech that finds its origins in the Holy Spirit.

It is not clear whether Paul actually believes it is possible to speak in the language of angels.  There is some evidence from the period before Jesus that some Jews believed it was possible.  Regardless, the Corinthians certainly thought that they were speaking the language of angels, or of the heavenly beings.

I know that some people point to Acts chapter two.  They say that true speaking in tongues will always be a language from this earth, i.e., a human language.  However, the initial outpouring of the Holy Spirit was a unique event.  The commencement of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit was a fulfillment of the Feast of Weeks.  The feast pointed to the harvest that would come in from the Spirit-empowered activity of the people of God.

We should also note that many things that happened at that first outpouring were not repeated, for example: Fire separating into individual tongues over each of the believers, the sound of a mighty rushing wind, and the reversal of the judgment of confusing the language of the people in Genesis 11.  These things can happen again as God wills, but we do not see them mentioned again.

The Corinthians wanted to be super-spiritual, but their thinking was not biblical.  Paul throughout 1 Corinthians was correcting them on this.  In chapter seven, we find that some married couples were trying to live without having sexual relations with one another.  This may sound strange to us, but it was an attempt to live like the angels here on earth.  In their opinion, being spiritual meant trying to live less like mortals on earth and more like angels in heaven.  Paul challenged them on it.  Their attempt to be spiritual would set them up for temptation.  He told them that refraining from sex for a short period in order to focus on prayer (i.e., like fasting) was okay, but they should not extend the period too long.  If they loved one another, then they would demonstrate their spirituality by physical intimacy. 

In chapter eleven, we see that some of them were trying to live as if there are no longer differences between men and women.  Again, being like the angels (super-spiritual) would mean to throw off all gender roles.  Paul challenges the women to recognize cultural norms in their demeanor, especially within the context of Christian gatherings.

In chapter 12, we saw that they thought speaking in tongues was the greatest gift.  They believed that a spiritual person would be more likely to speak in an unintelligible language.  Yet, Paul is showing them that this is not true spirituality.  True spirituality asks what the Holy Spirit is leading us to do and does it.

Their rejection of a bodily resurrection in chapter fifteen was also sourced in this messed up view of spirituality.  A bodily resurrection seemed to be going in the wrong direction, toward the earth rather than heaven.  Yet, Paul shows them that the bodily resurrection of believers is dependent upon the bodily resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ (who is the most spiritual of all humans). 

This brings us back to chapter 13. The key to Paul’s argument is picturing a spiritual gift being exercised without love for others.  We will deal with the clanging cymbal imagery at the end of this section.  “If I speak in the language of angels (the desire of the Corinthian Christians) but do not have love, then I am a clanging cymbal.”  He then does the same thing with two more spiritual gifts.  “If I have the gift of prophecy and know all mysteries and all knowledge…but have not love, I am nothing.”  “If I have all faith, so as to remove mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.” 

This last mention of the spiritual gift of faith that could even move mountains is an allusion to the words of Jesus in several different places.  In Matthew 17:20, Jesus spoke of casting out demons with faith the size of a mustard seed (i.e., it is not about a great amount, simply about believing).  In Luke 17:6, he spoke of dealing with unforgiveness in our own heart.  Of course, there it is not a mountain but a mulberry tree.  So, Paul is picturing a person who is the epitome of what Jesus is talking about.  Yet, without love, I am nothing!

As if that wasn’t enough, Paul adds two more things that are good in and of themselves and do not look like the previous spiritual gifts.  “If I give all my possessions to the poor…”  This reminds me of the rich young ruler who was challenged by Jesus to sell all his possessions, give the proceeds to the poor, and then follow him.  Even such a great act without love would be nothing.

Finally, Paul speaks of a person surrendering their body to be burned.  He may have in mind a person who is martyred for the cause of Christ.  Yet, if such was done without love, it would “profit me nothing. “ We can imagine doing something like that and finding out it didn’t benefit us at all.  What a shock.

All of these are intended to shock the Corinthians.  Paul describes things that they would see as spiritual in and of themselves: speaking in tongues, prophecy, the gift of faith, selling all of our possessions to feed the poor, and being martyred for Jesus.  Yet, Paul’s challenge to them is to point out the necessity of love in all our activity for Christ.  Without love, the one who speaks in tongues is a clanging cymbal.  God is not edified, and the people around them are not edified.  Without love, the one who gives prophecies and moves big things by their faith is nothing.  Without love, the one who feeds the poor and is martyred is not profited by it, i.e., they have not put any treasure in heaven (Matthew 6:19-21).

These three phrases: a clanging cymbal, nothing, and profits me nothing, are all saying that there is no spiritual benefit in good acts alone.  To use Paul’s words in Galatians 5:6, what is beneficial is faith in God working through love.  If my activity is not born out of faith in God working through the love of Christ, then it does not benefit me.

The Christian must always emphasize Christ-like character before activity.  Notice that Paul does not argue that they do not have the Holy Spirit.  The presence of the Holy Spirit does not insulate us from error any more than the presence of God in the garden insulated Adam and Eve from temptation.  The Corinthians were grieving the Holy Spirit as they exercised spiritual gifts, all the time thinking they were super spiritual. 

How long can you do that and spiritually survive?  Paul doesn’t say.  Nevertheless, we must (it is a necessity!) have love in all that we do but especially in exercising spiritual gifts.

The character of love (v. 4-7)

Paul then moves to describe the true nature of Christ’s love.  The structure of this section has 2 positive descriptions followed by 7 negative descriptions.  There is then 1 transitional negative and positive description that is followed by four rapid positive descriptions.  This section is crafted into a poetic piece.

Let’s look at the first two positive descriptions.  Love is patient.  The word “patient” here has the idea of having a long fuse, a slow temper.  Love is also kind.  If patience is restraining myself from unleashing unloving things upon a person, then kindness is pouring out good things upon a person, whether they deserve it or not.  Kindness is an overlooked virtue. 

Next, we have the seven negative descriptions of what love is not.  Most of these are self-explanatory. 

Love is not jealous (or envious).  Love does not brag and is not arrogant (puffed up with pride, an inflated sense of self).  Love does not “act unbecomingly” (NASB).  This has the idea of something that is shameful or disgraceful.  Love is not self-seeking.  It is not provoked (i.e., provoked to the point of anger and wicked actions).  Love does not consider wrongs against it.  This is more than not writing down a list or keeping one in your head.  It has a deeper sense of not taking note of wrongs done against you.  I simply don’t think about it or dwell on it.

This can be seen as an eighth negative description, but it is balanced by the positive that it should be.  Love does not rejoice in unrighteousness but rejoices with the truth (the truth of God’s love in Christ to save all people through our sacrifice to share it with them).  I would say that some in the Church are rejoicing in wicked things like abortion and trans-gendering our kids.  However, this is not love.  This is a self-seeking attempt to garner the acceptance of others at the expense of the truth of God.

Lastly, we have the four staccato statements that all include the phrase “in all things.”  The meaning works with some of the words, but others require a deeper understanding of what is meant by “in all things.

Love bears all things is the idea that it carries or puts up with all things.  Love does not quit carrying our brother though his sin is heavy.

Love believes all things.  This does not mean it believes anything that a person says to it.  The word believe is the same as having faith.  Love has faith in all things.  It never quits but always believes. 

Love hopes all things.  Again, “all things” is not about the object for which we hope.  Love never loses hope in any situation.  It is easy to give up on others especially when they sin against us.  Yet, love continues to hope for their salvation and sanctification.

Lastly, love endures all things.  This is another term for being patient.  It pictures a person remaining under a heavy load.  We may want to toss it off, but love compels us to stick in there, perseverance.

All of these things describe Jesus who is the very Image of the Father, and the pattern for our character and life.

The permanence of love beyond spiritual gifts (v. 8-13)

“Love never fails” looks at first like it is part of the previous description.  Thus, love is never defeated or fallen to the ground.  It is always victorious.

Yet, the following words add another meaning to the phrase.  Paul is telling us that love will never end nor will it fall away from our experience in the future.  This last description serves to transition to Paul’s last point about love versus spiritual gifts.

Love will never end, but spiritual gifts will come to an end (vs. 8).  A time will come when speaking in tongues will cease to be a thing that the Holy Spirit is working in God’s people.  A time will come when words of knowledge (Paul is talking about spiritual gifts here) will be done away.  The bigger truth in the area of spiritual gifts is that they are only for this present age, whereas love is for all ages.  A Christian must have love down first before going after spiritual gifts.

In verse nine, Paul brings up the idea that we presently know “in part” and prophesy “in part.”  This is connected to the idea that the Kingdom of God is now here, but not yet fully.  Thus, prophecy does not help us to know everything.  Rather, it gives us a part of the picture.  These gifts are necessary because we do not have full knowledge of everything that God is doing.  Yet, He gives us enough through the written Word, through mature believers, and through the gifts of the Holy Spirit.

In verse ten, Paul sees that there is a day “when the perfect comes” in which these partial things will be done away, i.e., the spiritual gifts.  There are some Christians who try to make the case that the perfect is the New Testament written down for us.  They try to say that once the apostles wrote these books, then the spiritual gifts went away.  Anyone who tries to do them today is not actually operating by the help of the Holy Spirit.

I do not believe this is the proper interpretation of that phrase.  All gifts of the Holy Spirit and the fruit of the Holy Spirit are pointed towards Christ, the perfect image of the Father.  Jesus is The Perfect who is coming back to this earth at some point in the future.  It is at the return of Jesus that spiritual gifts will be done away.  This is clear from the beginning of Paul’s letter to the Corinthians.  In chapter one verse seven he says, “you are not lacking in any gift, awaiting eagerly the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ.”  He is not talking about the New Testament.  He is talking about the Second Coming of Jesus!

Thus, spiritual gifts are still operational today.  The Spirit is still wanting to work through believers in these various ways.  When Jesus comes, he will bring this “now but not yet fully” period of time to a close.  Then spiritual gifts will drop away like training wheels on the bike of a kid who has learned to ride.

Verse 11 picks up this imagery.  When Paul talks about putting away childish things when he became a man, he does not mean that as a pejorative.  The things of childhood are necessary.  They are childish only in that they are connected to that state of development.  Similarly, our mortal lives as followers of Jesus are our spiritual childhood.  Yes, we want to become as spiritually mature in our life as we can.  However, the bodily resurrection that Christ will bring about will be our entrance into adulthood.  We will truly be the adult sons of God at that point.  The things of our childhood (now) will be put aside (then).

In verse twelve, Paul not only changes the metaphor to looking into a mirror, but he also speaks of what we know.  Now I am looking into a mirror that is dim, but then I will look into the face of God.  We presently do not see God fully, but we will in the future.  We presently know God’s plan fully, but we will in the future.  We will know just as sure as we are fully known by God right now.

This brings us to the last verse.  In the present, spiritual gifts are given by God, but they must be exercised in love.  Paul pairs love with faith and hope.  He sees these three virtues as abiding in our lives throughout this mortal stage.  The believer needs faith in what God has done through Jesus, hope in what God has promised for those who believe in Jesus, and love for God and others.  We cannot walk this Christian walk without the three virtues of faith, hope, and love.

Yet, the greatest of these is love.  This can simply be a poetic flourish.  However, if we think about the future state of having glorified, heavenly bodies, and dwelling directly in the presence of God, we might ask ourselves what faith and hope will look like then.  Faith is a thing because we do not fully see God.  We must trust Him.  Hope is a thing because we do not have all that God has promised.  We must wait upon Him.  However, when we see Him and receive all that He has promised, faith and hope will dissolve back into the underlying queen of virtues, love.  We will love and be loved for all eternity!

Gifts of the Holy Spirit 2 audio

The First Letter of Peter- 22

Subtitle: Closing Words

1 Peter 5:12-14. This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on Sunday, May 3, 2026.

As we finish this letter, we have reached the place where Peter gives his closing words to the recipients of it. 

It is mostly a basic closing of a letter. It mentions the carrier of the letter and gives greetings to people in the churches of Asia Minor from Peter and others with him.

Yet, there are a couple of items in this passage that have created some controversy. 

Let’s look at our passage.

Peter’s closing words (v. 12-14)

Peter first explains that the letter has come to them through a man named Silvanus.  Silvanus is mentioned as a fellow worker with Paul and Timothy in 2 Corinthians, 1 Thessalonians and 2 Thessalonians.

We should also make the connection between this Silvanus and the shortened form of his name used by Luke in Acts, Silas.  Though Peter and Paul use the longer form, Luke seems disposed to using a more intimate and informal name for him.

Silas was a Jewish Christian who was among the men of Jerusalem in the Jerusalem Council of Acts 15.  He accompanied Paul back to Antioch in order to verify the decision of the Jerusalem Council.  Luke describes him as a prophet and teacher who is clearly of Jewish descent.  Silas ends up accompanying Paul on his 2^nd Missionary journey through the areas addressed by Peter’s letter.  He would know the people and be familiar to them, having ministered among them with Paul.

Peter refers to Silvanus as a “faithful brother” and comments that this is his opinion or estimation of him.  The gist of this is simply that the one these churches know as a faithful brother already has also been found by Peter to be faithful as a brother in Christ, i.e., a spiritual brother.

By the way, this is how the New Testament really began.  Letters were written by apostles to particular churches or group of churches in a region.  We are not told how Silvanus distributed this letter to so many churches.  Did he come bearing multiple copies?  What church did he go to first?  Some of these questions we cannot know.  However, it is most likely that the letter was first given to a particular church, which would most likely make a copy of it.  Since Silvanus is well acquainted, it is most likely that he personally saw to the distribution.  It would allow him to touch base and minister to the churches similar to Paul’s attitude in his missionary journeys.  Thus, Silvanus would come to a particular town, a church member would make a faithful copy, and he would then take the letter to another town, most likely taking time to exhort the church on the contents of the letter.

Similarly, Paul’s letters to the church in Corinth would slowly be copied and shared with other churches in the region.  At some point, the Church felt it was important to assemble the verified letters of the apostles that had long acceptance in different regions into a collection.  This ultimately became the New Testament.  By the time this assembling happened, it would have been impossible to make up a letter that was not original to the apostles and pretend like it was.  Too many churches had copies of these letters over too long of a time.  The cry of “foul” would have been deafening from the churches if such was attempted.

Peter then summarizes his purpose in the letter.  He has both testified and exhorted them in the true grace of God.  He testified in that he declared what he heard and saw.  He has exhorted in the sense that he is calling them to stay true to what they have received.  This is what I know to be true, and this is what you should do.

So, what is the true grace of God?  We can start with pointing to Jesus.  Jesus as the Son of God and Son of Man had come as God’s Anointed to save Israel and the Gentiles.  This is opposed to all the false claimants to be God’s Messiah.  Jesus is the true Christ versus the false Christs that came before him, and those that came after him.  Peter gave faithful testimony to the person, work, and teaching of Jesus.

These teachings were taught and written down for the strengthening of those who believed.  These Scriptures are an analog revealing Jesus the Messiah to those who read it.

However, it is not enough to receive the truth about Christ in verbal and written form.  We must remain firm in our faith. 

Some versions differ between Peter giving a command, “Stand firm in it,” and Peter simply declaring, “in which you stand.”  The difference between the two is a couple of letters in the verb “stand.”  We do not know how the difference came about in some of the old manuscripts.  Regardless, both are good and true.  They had received the Gospel, so it is entirely appropriate for Peter to testify and to exhort that this is the true grace of God, in which you currently stand firm.

Yet, they will need to be faithful until the end of their lives.  Over time, threats will come against the true grace of God.  They will need to stand firm in what they have received.  Thus, it would be entirely appropriate to voice this as a command.

For us today, we may not know which form Peter initially intended.  However, we do know that Scripture challenges us with both ideas.  It is good for believers to be standing firm in what the Scriptures reveal about Jesus, but it is also important for us to persevere in standing firm to the end of our life.

There is generally nothing controversial in a section that sends greetings, but we have such here.  Peter’s phrase, “She who is in Babylon, chosen together with you,” has two areas of contention.

The first has to do with who or what is the pronoun “she” referencing?  This has been generally interpreted as referring to the body of believers where Peter is, i.e., the church he is at.  The word for church in Greek is a feminine term and thus takes a feminine pronoun.  It is singular because the group is spoken of as a singular entity, a local expression of the greater Church of Jesus.  This also fits with the fact that we know Peter is addressing churches in Asia Minor.  A pronoun without connection to a person or name would more naturally connect to another church.  In fact, the description of being chosen together with the recipients of the letter further strengthens the idea of “she” referring to the local church in Peter’s location.

It wasn’t until later that the idea was floated that “she” could refer to Peter’s wife.  The problem with this is that she is never mentioned in the letter, and it would not be the most natural interpretation of Peter’s words.

Just as the early church referred to each other as brothers and sisters (spiritually), churches were commonly referred to as sisters.  This ties into the Hebrew usage in the Old Testament of the current citizens of a city being the daughters of the city (seen as a mother), e.g., the daughters of Jerusalem etc.

Another example of this in the New Testament is in 2 John 1:13. “The children of your elect sister send you greetings.”  The current believers who make up the chosen sister church where I am at send you greetings. 

I think it is most natural and most fitting with the evidence of history to see this as a reference to the believers of a particular church.

The second question in the above phrase is the identity of Babylon.  Is this a literal reference to Babylon or is it a symbolic reference to Rome?

The earliest evidence we have that still exists is from around AD 313.  Eusebius in his Church History cites an earlier work from Papias.  He states that Papias had written a five-volume work called Exposition of the Sayings of the Lord.  Eusebius claims that Papias, along with other early church fathers, believed Babylon in verse 13 to be a symbolic reference to Rome.

We should also note that there is no known counterclaim that literal Babylon was intended.  Thus, the evidence of history at this point would be on the side of a symbolic reference to Rome.

However, it is not implausible that Peter could have gone to literal Babylon.  There was a large Jewish community in Babylon that eventually became the source for the Babylonian Talmud.  It would make sense that the Apostle to the Jews could be sent by the Holy Spirit to testify there.  Yet, there is no evidence from history that states such.  It is simply a conjecture that could only be substantiated if we assume Babylon is literal here.

John has a similar thing in the Revelation of Jesus Christ.  There is a reference to “Mystery Babylon” which sits on seven hills.  The testimony of the early church is that this referred to Rome.

Babylon was prophesied against by the Old Testament prophets.  But, a close reading of those prophecies will note that Babylon comes to be treated as a Symbol or a System that is created by a rebellious spirit behind it.  This spirit of empire and domination by wicked spirits is used of an end-time city/powerhouse that will be destroyed by the Beast.

Why has this become an issue?  The Reformation led to many arguments between Protestants and Roman Catholics.  A main contention between them had to do with the authority of the Pope.  Did God give him authority to command all the Church of God on earth?  Roman Catholics say yes and Protestants say no.

In arguing these cases, several lines of arguments cross this verse.  The Roman Catholics point to Peter as being the Rock (foundation) of the Church.  They also claim that he was the first Bishop of Rome.  He then handed his authority down to the next Bishop upon his death.  They then claim an unbroken line of succession from Peter to the current Pope.  The authority of Peter belongs to the current Pope.

Protestants may argue against Peter ever being in Rome, except perhaps at his execution.  They will also argue that Peter was never a bishop in Rome, definitely not the first bishop.  In fact, the New Testament never speaks of Peter going to Rome.  Even when Paul goes to Rome at the end of Acts, it already has a church of believers there.  If there were not already a bishop of this church, then he would have definitely set some faithful elders into those positions, as was his way among all the churches he started.  Peter is not mentioned as residing there.  He is most likely still in Jerusalem or that region.

Regardless of all of the above, Protestants can be polarized into believing that they have to believe this is literal Babylon in order to prove the argument of the Romanists wrong.  I believe this is a fallacy.  Regardless of whether this is a symbolic reference to Rome or a literal reference to Babylon, this does not matter with the argument over Papal succession and authority.  The truth is the truth, and men are quite capable of taking a true statement and using it to substantiate a false claim.  It is the claim that is false and not the statement used to support it.

Ultimately, it has no bearing on our faith where Peter is writing this letter.

Peter then gives them greetings from “my son, Mark.”  Mark is not his literal son, but his son spiritually.  This is the nephew of Barnabas who abandoned Paul’s first missionary journey into Asia Minor.  He eventually became a helper with Barnabas and then later with Peter.  Mark with Peter was similar to the way Timothy was for Paul, a younger minister that aided them in their ministry.

This Mark is the same one who wrote the Gospel of Mark.  Mark was too young to know all that Jesus did, but his Gospel has historically been described as the account of Jesus from Peter’s perspective.

Peter takes advantage of the greetings that he gives in order to remind them to greet one another with the kiss of love.  Now, the kiss of love is the opposite of the kiss of betrayal given by Judas to Jesus.  The kiss of betrayal is a superficial pretense that covers wickedness underneath.  Christians are to greet one another with a kiss of love, not hypocrisy. 

Of course, how cultures greet one another are various.  It was common in those days to kiss on the cheek those you meet.  In our culture, we might say to greet one another with a handshake of love.  We should not be outward jerks to one another, but neither should we be fake with one another.  Christians must do the inner work of being able to love other Christians.

Personality clashes and events that happen between two people can muddy the waters of our love for one another.  It takes forgiveness and repentance for a group too remain in the love of Christ for one another.

Finally, Peter blesses them by saying, “Peace be unto you all who are in Christ.”  The Christian has peace with God because they have believed upon the One that He has sent to save us.  When we embrace Jesus, we are no longer enemies to God, and He is no longer an enemy to us.  If this is rightly understood and believed, it gives a person an inner sense of peace by the Holy Spirit regardless of the chaos and threats of suffering that surround them.  It is a peace that passes all understanding.  If you know that you are okay (right) with God, then the threats and slander of men are easier to ignore.

Yet, Peace also describes the eternal purpose of God for those who belong to Jesus by faith.  We are in Christ like Noah and his family were in the ark.  Judgment is coming upon this earth, but the one who believes and follows Christ is in the safe place that God has provided for them.  Jesus is not just a way to avoid judgment.  He is one with whom we have a relationship through the Holy Spirit.

Our challenge is to hold fast the proven and true Word of God we have received from faithful believers before us.  Yet, that word teaches us how to know the Lord Jesus and how to follow him.  May we stay faithful to Jesus, the Faithful One, until the end of our life!

Closing Words audio

The First Letter of Peter- 18

Subtitle: Our Witness before the World- Part 10

1 Peter 4:7-11. This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on Sunday, March 22, 2026. 

As Peter has called Christians to have the same mind that Christ had when he suffered in the flesh for the will of God, he now turns to give some further commands that become more about how Christians are towards one another. 

Of course, this is a witness to the world.  Yet, more importantly, this world is coming to an end.  This makes our witness to the world far more critical.  This is the idea behind this passage.

Let’s get into our passage.

The end of all things has come near (v. 7-11)

Peter has just described Jesus as being “ready” to judge the living and the dead.  Here, we have a similar phrase.  “The end of all things is near (or at hand).”  In both of these phrases, we can focus on the amount of time connected to these events.  If Jesus is ready and the end is near (literally “has come near”), then surely it means that there is very little time until they happen.

This is not necessarily true, neither is it evidently true.  Jesus can be ready to judge now while the Father is not telling him to do so.  In other words, it is the Father who will signal when the judgment occurs.  Jesus is simply in the ready position.  He doesn’t need to do anything else.  Before the cross, before the grave, and before the resurrection, Jesus was not ready to judge.  He is ready now.  Yet, it can still be a long time until the Father sends him in judgment.

This same thing is true for the end of all things being at hand.  Many say that the disciples believed Jesus would come back in their lifetime and that they were simply wrong.  However, this is not necessarily true.  The disciples were given parables by Jesus stating that it would be longer than they would think (e.g., Luke 12:40-48).  John also records that Jesus told Peter how he would die (John 21:19).  It would be odd for Peter to think of Jesus coming back in his lifetime and yet dying a martyr’s death later.  Peter also warns people in his second letter (2 Peter 3:3-9) about scoffing at the delay in our Lord’s return.

So, what is intended here?  Some try to make this only about the end of temple worship and Israel as a nation.  I believe this is only a part of what Peter is talking about.  For Jews, the end of all of their things was at hand.  The nation would end, and the temple would end.  However, the judgment of Israel is itself a warning to the nations.  Just as Jesus was presented to Israel and then judgment, so Jesus is presented to the nations by Christians.  There is a day of judgment, an end of the times of the gentiles and the day of grace.  Thus, the lesser judgment of one nation like Israel, or like the Roman empire later, is a picture of a greater judgment that hangs over the whole earth, a judgment that Jesus is ready to bring to the earth at the Father’s command.

Christians are to live with this in mind.  The world is going to be judged.  We are to exercise patient diligence until that day.  Our patient diligence leads to the salvation of people who believe in Christ.  This fruitfulness is God’s desire through us.

Peter then gives two commands that should connect to our times of prayer.  The first has to do with having a sound mind, or healthy thinking, for the purpose of prayer.  Of course, this is not the only purpose for having a sound mind, nor is it only to be had during our prayers.  Our sound and healthy mind will look at the reality of God bringing the way of this world to an end in Jesus, and it will then be turned to prayer.  It is the word of God in connection with the Holy Spirit that transforms our thinking to that which Christ had (1 Peter 4:1).  It is in prayer that these things are kneaded into our lives like a baker kneads bread.  In prayer, we wrestle with our flesh and with the Lord over the reality of judgment hanging over this world.

The devil doesn’t want you to pray, but the worst enemy of prayer in our life is our own flesh (sinful nature).  Jesus planted a seed of teaching within his disciples on the night he was betrayed.  Their spirits were willing to stand with Jesus in his hour of trial, but their flesh was weak.  It is only through prayer we will be able to force our flesh to walk out the will of God the Father.  It was the sound mind of Christ that looked at his situation and recognized that the cross was the only way.  He knew what was at stake and what was needed to serve God.  We are to follow Jesus in this, seeking the help of God.

This can be contrasted with the worldly, unhealthy thinking that leads to the kind of things Peter described in 1 Peter 4:3,4.  The world thinks you are strange for not thinking and acting like they do, but you are listening to God, not them.

Peter also commands us to have a sober mind for the purpose of prayer.  This is a similar concept but comes from the realm of drinking alcohol.  Literal drunkenness would be included in this, but this verse speaks to a greater inebriation that occurs in a life that is focused on gratifying the desires of the flesh rather than the desires of God.  Alcohol messes with our inhibitions and our ability to properly analyze the world around us.  This often creates an unreal (fantastic) view of how we are doing.

All of this (the healthy mind and sober mind) pictures a person who knows the seriousness of the hour in which we live.  They understand that it calls for a serious and focused life.  Such a life is fueled by a relationship with God through the Word and Prayer.  It is in prayer that we seek God’s strength and wisdom to wrestle our flesh to the ground and pin it (over and over).  It is in prayer that we discover God’s purpose in our life.  It is in prayer that we guard our heart from the constant attempt of the devil, this world, and our own flesh to pull us off this course of following Jesus.

Peter then tells believers to keep fervent in their love for one another.  Fervent is a good translation.  However, it literally means to be stretched out.  A football player who really wants to catch the ball will stretch themselves out even though they risk injury when they hit the ground.  In loving people, the idea of stretching out connects to helping them.  This is often represented by our hands which are often the vehicle of helping others.  Is my love for others with a stretched-out hand, or do I have T-Rex like arms that can barely extend past myself?  Love is not primarily a feeling.  It is a choice to stretch ourselves for the well-being of another person.

Peter is focused here on loving other Christians, even though we are also to love our enemies.  Christians need to work for the spiritual and physical well-being of one another by the wisdom and help of Jesus.  Prayer is the place where we seek God’s wisdom in all the ways we can stretch ourselves out for one another.

It is easy to let our love grow cold for others.  In Matthew 24:12, Jesus said that “because of lawlessness, the love of many will grow cold.”  May the Lord help us to remain fervent (hot) in our love for one another, stretched out to the point of risking ourselves.

At this point, Peter quotes from Proverbs 10:12. “Love covers a multitude of sins.”  This is not to say that we should cover up sin.  Rather, it is the picture of how loving relationships are working towards peace and not strife, growth and not death, lifting up and not pushing down.  Love does not look for errors to be used against another person.

The idea of covering has a connection to atonement.  To atone for sin is to make a proper covering for it.  God’s covering for our sins does not pretend that they never existed, yet neither does it desire to rub our nose in it.  Love seeks a righteous and healthy way to cover for the sins of others.

Sometimes this is simply not making an issue of small sins.  We all need room to grow and a personal audit by everyone in our life regarding the minutia of our failures becomes stifling.  We are all a work in progress. Instead of looking for ways to expose and highlight one another’s faults, instead of harshly condemning one another for even the hint of spiritual immaturity, we help each other, knowing that we too have much room for improvement.

Sometimes love sees that a correction is needed.  Yet, we speak the truth in love (for their well-being).  It is for the purpose of healing things that require the help of another.  We need God’s wisdom to discern when this is needed.

In Psalm 32:1, David paralleled this concept, to cover sins, with the idea of forgiving a multitude of sins.  Our faults and failures are tests of how committed to loving one another we are, and our commitment to loving one another is a test to how committed we are to loving Jesus.

Peter further describes this fervent love with the command to be hospitable to one another without complaining.  Hospitality at its root has the idea of love shown to those who are strangers.  Of course, they don’t have to be a stranger to you.  When you invite a friend into your home and show them hospitality, this is not their home.  They are foreigners or strangers to this home in the sense that they do not live there.  Yet, you take their coat, feed them, and serve them.  This is hospitality.

Hospitality includes the drawing of people into a relationship and caring for them as family.  To do so without complaint may not be hard for some people, but it can be for others.  We should never complain when we stretch ourselves out in love because Jesus stretched himself out for us.  If you find yourself complaining about these matters, be quick to stop yourself.  Ask the Lord to forgive you and fill you with a heart of love for others.

Peter then tells us to be serving one another.  Again, this is simply another way of speaking about love.  We should note that this is the third time that he has used this phrase “one another.”  Its repetition helps to slam home the point.  We are in this together.  Jesus is not just saving me; he is saving “we.”  We need one another.  This is the bond of love that creates a unity of the Spirit of God.

This serving term is pretty elastic.  It is not about a high or low level.  It is simply about serving others.  Perhaps, Peter may have been thinking about the words of Jesus in Matthew 20:26-28. Those Christians who want to be great need to learn to serve one another, and if you want to be first, you need to learn to become a slave of all the rest, like Jesus did.  Of course, they are not our masters.  Jesus is.

In this area of serving one another, Peter speaks about gifts that we each have.  The word behind this is the Greek word charisma.  Charis is Greek for grace.  When a Greek word has the -ma ending, it is speaking of a particular instance of grace.  It is generally translated as a gift and can refer to natural gifts and spiritual gifts.  God has blessed believers with natural and spiritual gifts.  We need to use these to serve one another on his behalf.

In fact, we are to be “stewards of the manifold grace of God.”  God’s grace is spread through a great variety of gifts, specific grace. 

These gifts in your life are really from God.  Why has He given them to you?  He has not given them to you as a means of saying that you are more special than others who do not have your giftings.  Rather, the giver of all gifts spreads them variously as He desires.  We need to see them as His.  We are to manage God’s things in this life that He has given us.  Whether this is a wealth of money or a wealth of wisdom, whatever it be, we must be good stewards.  A good steward doesn’t hide the gift and bury it.  A good steward doesn’t abuse the gift and use it only for themselves.  Rather, a good steward spends time in prayer seeking God’s intention for those gifts.  He didn’t give them to me for serving myself.  He has gifted others to serve you.  You must focus on serving others as the practical outflow of God’s love in your life.

The steward image reminds us that we will give account to the giver of these gifts.  When we serve others, we are being fruitful in the way that God intends.  A common pitfall that messes up our serving is when we look at others and compare ourselves to them.  One person may become conceited because their gifts seem greater than others.  Another person may become depressed and do nothing because they think that they do not have any gifts.  Both of these are errors.  Quit looking at the gifts others have.  Rather, look at how you can help the people around you, even if it is in little ways.  Pray about it.  Seek God and His gifts will manifest in your life in small and great ways.

Peter then speaks to some particular gifts.  “If one speaks, let him speak as the oracles of God.”  It is likely that Peter is referring to spiritual gifts that are expressed in the times that a church gathers.  However, this principle applies to all of our speech to one another.  If we are going to say anything, we need to say it as if we were giving an oracle from God.  I may not have received a prophecy, word of knowledge, etc. from God, but my speech needs to be treated seriously.  It is one of the gifts that God has given me.  I can speak into the lives of others.  I shouldn’t be flippant and manage that gift frivolously.  I should always be speaking into the lives of others for God’s purpose and not my own.

Similarly, Peter challenges us to serve with the strength that God supplies.  We may be afraid to stretch out and help others because we believe that we lack.  However, God often supplies as we stretch out for others.  There is a partnership and a co-working that happens when we serve His purposes in serving others.

Verse 11 caps this off with a great principle.  Our purpose in everything should be to glorify the Father through Jesus Christ.  Jesus is still seated at the right hand of the Father, ready and awaiting the day of the Father’s choosing.  He will come and set this world right.  Each day you wake up is another day of grace for the salvation of people.  Lean into it.  Step into it and stretch yourself out.  May God help us to be a gift to one another and a light to this dark world!

Witness 10 audio