The Sermon on the Mount XVIII

Subtitle:  Conclusion-The Narrow Gate

Matthew 7:13-14.  This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on April 21, 2024.

We have reached the point where Jesus concludes his sermon.  It is a series of warnings to those who have heard the teaching of Jesus.  If the warnings are heeded, then they will enjoy the fruit of being a disciple of Jesus, but if they are not, then the words of Jesus will do them no good.  Thus, it is not enough to hear the words of Jesus.  One must put them into practice in the way that he intends.

Our emphasis today is on the metaphor of a narrow gate.  Jesus is a polarizing figure, not because he intends to be so, but because he is absolute truth in a fallen and sinful world.  Thus, the words of Jesus put the ball in our court.  What are we going to do?  Will we believe in Jesus and obey his commands, or will we not believe in him and reject his commands?  In fact, Scripture reveals Jesus as the very embodiment of what the Bible itself is pointing to (Revelation 19:10).  He is the Living Word of God (John 1:1f). 

Let’s look at our passage.

Enter the narrow gate (v. 13-14)

Jesus gives his listeners a command, “Enter by the narrow gate…”  This is the righteous, proper response to hearing the Messiah.  He is opening the door to the kingdom of heaven and they need to enter.

Hearing the Gospel of Jesus Christ is a privilege and great blessing, but it also puts a big decision on your plate.  What will you do with Jesus?  This is the wonderful grace of God that He sends people with the Gospel to us.  He also forgives the sins of those who put their faith in Jesus.  On top of this, what if God only let us hear the Gospel once and then held us accountable for that first decision for eternity?  Yet, this is not how God deals with us.  He holds his hands out to us even in our stubbornness and resistance.  God’s grace allows us to repent of our past choices to reject the Gospel.

However, we should be careful not to take it for granted that we will have tomorrow, or our old age, to “get right with God.”  Now is the day of salvation.

The gate is an access point.  Jesus is the access point into the kingdom.  We need to go into it.  Yet, there is another gate, another door.  The other gate is described as a wide gate.  The narrow gate is not as easy to enter, but the wide gate is eay to enter.  There is plenty of room.  It is probably far more impressive because of its wideness too.  In fact, if we picture the narrow gate as that one degree that puts us on the right path, then we will see that the wide gate is the infinitude of other choices, and other voices, that we can hear and choose to follow.

The gate or door, as I said earlier, points to Jesus.  He alone has the words of the Father.  Jesus makes this clear in John 10:7-9.  “I am the door of the sheep.  All who ever came before me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not hear them.  I am the door.  If anyone enters by me, he will be saved, and will go in and out to find pasture.

There are two ways we can look at this gate.  In Matthew 7, Jesus pictures the gate as an access point onto a way that leads to a particular destination.  John Bunyan in The Pilgrim’s Progress from this Word to the Next uses this analogy.  Christian must turn away from living in the City of Destruction and go through the narrow Gate towards the Celestial City of the King. 

In John 10, Jesus is using the imagery of the flock of the LORD.  The good shepherd lets the sheep come into the pen, which represents the place of safety.  The sheep are cared for by the shepherd, who takes them in and out in order to obtain what they need.  It is a picture of life in the kingdom.  In that sense, we are not so much trying to go somewhere.  We are simply in relationship with the Good Shepherd.

If we put these two images together, then we recognize that Christ takes care of us as we grow in this life to image the Father.  This is all possible because we have a Good Shepherd.  When we physically die, we will only enter into that next good thing that the good shepherd has for us. 

We can also think of the narrow gate in the same way that Paul reveals it in Galatians  chapter one.  People can misrepresent Jesus and the Gospel into a different Gospel, a different Jesus.  In Galatians 1:7, Paul warns against those who pervert the Gospel of Christ.  Thus, the narrow path represents the Jesus who is revealed to us, once and for all, in the New Testament and, through typology, in the Old Testament.  We must pay close attention to Jesus and put our faith in him.

The two gates open up onto two very different paths, roads, or ways.  This is not a literal path.  It represents a person who is following the Way of the LORD.  It represents living a life that is informed, empowered, and directed by Jesus.

The way of Christ (the narrow gate) is described as difficult.  The word is connected to tribulation and has the sense of pressure that squeezes us.  Of course, this is in contrast to the way that the wide gates opens up to.

The wide gate leads to a broad way.  The word broad literally has the idea of spacious country.  This road is not just wide.  It is easy with plenty of room for everyone.  There is no squeezing and cramping of your style on this path.  Essentially the difference of the two gates, narrow and wide, extend to the two paths, difficult and easy.

Imagine looking through a small gate and seeing a way on the other side that is difficult and filled with tribulation.  Then, imagine looking through a wide gate and seeing a way on the other side that is easy and has no tribulation, at least not comparatively.  Note: I don’t want to give the impression that Jesus is saying that non-believers have a life that is completely easy.  However, their way is easy in all the respects that the difficult path is hard. 

Here are some verses worth meditating upon.

2 Timothy 3:12, “All who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution.”

1 Thessalonians 3:4, “We told you before when we were with you that we would suffer tribulation, just as it happened, and you know.”

Revelation 1:9, “I, John, both your brother and companion in the tribulation and kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was on the island of Patmos for the word of God and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.”

The way of Jesus is difficult because of several reasons.  First, our flesh doesn’t like what Jesus commands, at least not all of it.  The Bible says that our flesh is hostile to the things of the Spirit (Romans 8:5-8). 

Second, the way of Jesus is difficult because the world is full of people who are going their own way, and many who have rejected Jesus.  They represent a flow of the stream in a different direction.  This is hard for us.  Also, Jesus tells us to love those who hate us and spitefully treat us, i.e., our enemies.  This too is very hard on our flesh.

Third, The way of Jesus is difficult because we have spiritual enemies, the devil, his angels, and the demons, who do not want us to follow Jesus.  They employ every temptation and scheme that they can to make it hard for us to follow Jesus.

I purposefully used the phrase “the way of the LORD” earlier.  We see this phrase throughout the Old Testament.  In Genesis 18:19, God recognizes that Abraham will command his children to keep the way of the LORD.  We should also make the connection back to Genesis three, where the way to the tree of life is blocked by the cherubim.  There was not going back into the garden as sinful people.  We had to trust God and go forward.  Israel had this same dynamic when they first refused to fight the giants.  When God told them that they would go into the desert for 40 years, they tried to go back and fight.  It was too late.  Their resistance and rebellion to the plan of God required going forward and learning the lessons of God’s faithfulness.  God’s way takes us forward through the scary things ahead of us, and brings us out the other side to the good thing that He has planned for us.  We can trust Him!

This is similar to how Psalm1 and Psalm 2 fit together.  The blessed man rejects the way of the wicked but meditates on God’s word.  It makes him fruitful tree.  In Psalm two, we see the Anointed One of God.  He is the perfect Israelite who sits at the right hand of the Father, even though the wicked fight against him.  It ends with saying that those who trust in Messiah are blessed, i.e., Messiah sums up the way of the LORD.  He is the ultimate tree of life to whom we can connect and become a righteous branch.  He is the waters of life to whom we can draw life and be fruitfulness.  He is the ultimate Blessed Man of Psalm 1 (Genesis 12) in whom all others are blessed.

Next, we are told that the two ways lead to two different destinations:  life and destruction.  Life here is the full life of God, eternal life, but not just in terms of length.  It is a quality of experience that can be described as a fullness of life without end.  The narrow gate with its difficult road leads to eternal life.  More than this, from other places, we know that the way itself has an experience of this life along the way (John 7:38).  

Yet, the wide gate with its easy way leads to destruction (death).  This is reminiscent of Proverbs 14:12, “There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death.”  We need to be careful the gate we go in, and the path that we walk (even if it is difficult).  The best things in life are always at the end of a difficult journey, and even the difficult journey itself becomes a kind of life as we persevere, cry out to God, and see His help.

The word “seems” in the above quoted verse is important.  One path seems good and feels good.  Yet, it leads to destruction.  Of course, all scams are set up to use your flesh against you.  Here, Jesus is warning us against the ultimate scam of this world.  If we follow Jesus, we will encounter difficulty, but we will take hold of the very life of God too.  If we reject Jesus, we may encounter ease and comforts, but we will find our life full of destruction in the end.

The narrow gate with its difficult way is loathed by our flesh.  However, if we continue to stay connected to Jesus by faith, we will find his supply of life flowing into our hearts and mind, even though we are in these mortal bodies.  This is why Paul taunts death and the grave.  “O Death, where is your sting, O Grave, where is your victory?”  As the follower of Christ approaches death, they can be never more alive because of what is only moments away, union with our LORD!

This is the same decision that Moses spoke about in Deuteronomy 30:19.  He said to them, “I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing; therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may live…”  It really is a choice between life and death, but not just in the natural.  It is a spiritual choice that impacts eternity, and that impact on eternity impacts our mortal life now.

We end with the shocker.  The shocker is that Jesus, speaking to Jews who had the word of God and His help, reveals that few will find the way to life, and most will follow the way to destruction.  This same point is made in a different context in Luke 13:23.  There a person simply asks Jesus if many people will be saved or few.  Jesus answers with this narrow gate imagery.  “Strive to enter through the narrow gate, for many, I say to you, will seek to enter and will not be able.”  It is the difficulty of the road and the pampering of their own flesh that disables them.

In John 14:6, Jesus says, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life.  No one comes to the Father except through Me.”  Notice that the same components of the gate, way, destination are in this.  Jesus is not only the gate, but he is the path that we walk, the truth to which we hold on firmly.   Yet, relationship with the Father is the life that we will have, which is also relationship with Him.  Jesus is our everything.  Jesus is the fruitful tree of life and water of life that all who want to be fruitful in this life and the next will connect to.  When we do that, we will bring forth life in the here and now. 

Perhaps, you hear this and are discourage because you failed to follow him.  The apostle Peter also failed to follow Jesus, and yet God still loved him and offered him another chance.  Do you know that God still loves you too?  May God help us to choose life this morning and everyday hereafter so that we can be a conduit of God’s life into this world.

The Narrow Gate audio

The Acts of the Apostles 64

Subtitle: Just Who is the Prisoner?

Acts 16:25-34.  This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on November 19, 2023.

Have you ever noticed that there are some people who have a lot of things, but they are never thankful?  We all wrestle with this, but some people are especially bad in this area.  They are always complaining that they don’t have that, or that they do have this, or that something happened, didn’t happen, etc.  They tend to only see what they don’t have, but even this is not their problem.

Imagine all the things that you don’t have, but that you also don’t want.  I can think of all manner of things that I do not have and I thank God that I don’t have them.  How many bad things could have happened to me today that didn’t? 

Our title today asks the question, “Just who is the prisoner?”  There are people who have very little, but some of them are the most thankful people you will ever meet.  In fact, we tend to do one of two things when we run into them.  We may be impressed, like being around them, and try to be better at it.  Or, we may be annoyed by them, and do what we can to avoid them.  I ask the question because we don’t always know who is mentally imprisoned by things.

Being a prisoner is more about your mind than it is about the external circumstances.  Richard Wurmbrand was a Christian pastor in Romania when the communists took over.  He was imprisoned for standing against the communists.  Eventually, he was released and he came to the United States of America in order to exhort American Christians to pray for the persecuted Church throughout the world.

I mention this because we are often too fixated on what we don’t have, here in the land of plenty.  People elsewhere would be thankful for even 10% of what we have.  What about freedom?  Would we remain faithful to Jesus if we lost our freedoms overnight?  Would we complain that God doesn’t love us, or that “it doesn’t work”?

Let’s look at our passage and may the Lord help us to be a thankful people.

Paul and Silas end up in a prison in Philippi (v. 26-34)

Paul had cast a demon out of a fortune-telling slave.  Her owners used their power and relation to the people of Philippi to abuse Paul and Silas by having them beaten and thrown into prison. 

We do not know exactly what time they ended up in prison in stocks, but our passage picks up at midnight.  Here, we find Paul and Silas praying and singing hymns to God.  That may seem unlikely to most.  Of course, they were badly beaten and are not able to sleep.  What else do you do in such a case?  They were having a bad day.  Still, they look to God for help, but also to praise Him.

When your day is surrendered to Jesus like theirs was even the bad things will have something good in them  It is not like God causes them to be thrown into prison.  There are plenty of bad actors who do not like them.  There are enough sinners around you to put you in prison.  We don’t need to blame that on God because He allows it to happen.

We need to stop looking at God like a micromanager who is the direct agent behind everything that happens in life.  Of course, God takes full responsibility for the universe that He has created, but that is not the same thing as being primarily responsible for sinful acts.

Bad things can come into our life because of the sin of others, and it can come into our life because of our own poor or sinful choices.  We are in a sea of sinful choices that causes difficult and troubling things.  Yet, in the midst of that, God promises to help us if we will trust him and live for Him.  In fact, sometimes it is the “bad” stuff that does the most good.  Think about Jesus on the cross.

We are also very bad at defining what is good and what is bad.  There are many things in my life that I once thought were bad, but there was a blessing in them that I couldn’t see at the time.  God has shown me over time that they were not nearly as bad as I thought, and they were a lot better than I gave them credit for.  The next time you think that you are having a bad day, then think about this. Remind yourself that you are really bad at defining things.  Maybe this day isn’t nearly as bad as I feel like it is right now.

We need to let God redeem our thinking.  If you suffer for doing the right thing (like Paul and Silas were doing), it is not because God hates you.  No, He loves you, and He wants you to keep faith through it.

They are awake at midnight because God is their only hope and their only joy.  They may be in chains, but their minds are not in chains.  Our greatest chains are the ones in our minds.  May we learn to trust Jesus and throw off such chains.

Paul and Silas couldn’t sleep so they talked with God about their situation.  When you can’t do anything, that’s a good time to pray.  There is no prison that can keep you from praying.  It can only influence you not to pray.

What are some of the chains that keep us from praying?  We can let chains of anger towards God keep us from praying.  Why is this happening to me?  Yet, imagine if God did this to us?  What if God followed His anger and demanded of us why we were doing this to Him?

We can let chains of fear bind us.  Paul and Silas could feared that their going to die in that prison and that no one who had power cared for them.  But, that is not what they did.

They could have let chains of despair drag them down.  Why is God doing this to us?  We have served Him so well, and now this!  This isn’t worth it; I quit!  I’ve done all of this work for nothing, and God doesn’t care!

One of the greatest tests for a believer is suffering in one form or another.  Suffering tests our faith far greater than anything else.  Weak faith is easily stripped down in the furnace of affliction.  What if you lost everything in your life?  Would you be able to continue serving God, loving Him, being thankful?

Yet, the Bible tells us that God is in the furnace with us.  He has promised to work all the things we are going through for a good purpose, at least if we are one of those who love Him (Romans 8:28).  Ephesians 1:11-12 says that He “works all things according to the counsel of His will, that we who first trusted in Christ should be to the praise of His glory.”

Stories about heroes always sound amazing because they are about someone else.  But, what if it was me?  We have too many examples in Scripture to doubt that God is worthy of our praise even in persecution, or to doubt that He doing something good through it.

Sin is like chains.  It starts out small and is easily broken, but over a long period of time and continued sinning, it becomes thicker and thicker.  Soon, we are at its mercy and unable to get free.  Paul and Silas were not in bondage to sin, and thus, they were able to praise God in a tough situation. 

There are also chains of fleshly desires, the chains of being praised by others, and many others.  Don’t wait until they are so strong that you can’t get free.

At midnight, we are told that an earthquake shakes the jail and the chains break free of the walls and floors.  The cell doors open and Paul and Silas are freed from the stocks.  We don’t know if the shackles broke free from their hands.  The angel did this for Peter in Acts 12.  Sometimes God answers us sooner than we think He will.

I would not venture to say that most prayers are not answered right away because there are so many prayers of our heart and spirit that we cannot keep track of them all.  Yet, at least in the area of things that seem big in our mind, we can tend to prepare ourselves to settle in for the long haul.  You may pray for years for some things, months for others, days, etc.  Of course, how many Christians in history have ended up in prison due to persecution, and yet were not set free by God that first night?  The answer is most of them.

Our hope is not in how quickly God answers our prayers, but in the fact that He always answers.  If the situation doesn’t change today, then I need to remain faithful to Him, and remain a faithful light.  Waiting on the Lord is never easy.  However, His timing is always good, and we can trust it.  Even for those who perished in a prison, God did not fail them.  At the resurrection, they will rejoice that their prayer was finally answered!

We must also be careful of seeing the earthquake itself as the answer.  It is only part of what God is doing.  How long did they contemplate what to do?  Or, did they immediately ask God what they should do?  Does God want us to run?

I believe that Paul understood that God was doing a special work that would aid the Gospel in Philippi.  So, when it came down to it, he remained in his cell waiting to see what God would do next.

The story moves to the jailer.  After the earthquake, he is sure that the prisoners will escape.  There is one rule of a warden in charge of securing prisoners.  You guard this man, these men, at the risk of your life.  The warden despairs of any hope of finding the prisoners so he draws his sword in order to take his own life.  Paul and Silas can either see him outside the dark prison, or they hear him draw his sword and figure out what is going on, or perhaps the Holy Spirit tells them what is going on.  Regardless, they stop the warden from killing himself by ensuring him that they are all still in the prison.

At this point, the warden, shocked at all that has transpired, trembles and asks what he must do to be saved.  Wow, that is a turn around. 

We need to always remember that our worst days can become our best days because of Jesus.  The last 24 hours were not on Paul and Silas’ top ten favorites of ministering for the Lord, at least not yet.  They were in excruciating pain while they prayed and sang to the Lord.

We should note that even before they were released the prisoners and the warden could hear them praying and singing.  No doubt, they had pegged these men for loony bins, but your in prison.  The content of their prayers and songs would have resonated in their minds.  Who are these strange guys?  How can they be hopeful and praiseful in a time like this, in a place like this?

Whether Paul and Silas realized it or not, they were living out a sermon that night to a whole prison full of men who needed Jesus, even the jailer.

Sometimes God lets things happen in our life because other people are watching us, and He wants us to be a witness to them.  This is a holy moment when men who have been beaten for serving Jesus cry out to him in prayer and praise.  Those men were witnessing a holy moment.

Paul and Silas tell the jailer, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household.”  How did he know to ask for salvation?  Perhaps, it is from the content of their prayers and songs.  It may also be from the stories about the fortune-teller slave that was freed from a demon.  She had said they would declare the way of salvation.

Regardless, he is given the way.  We can sometimes make salvation much more complicated than it needs to be.  It all boils down to faith in Jesus.  If you keep your faith in Jesus, then everything else will be worked out.  Jesus will lead and help you.  Jesus has given this man powerful witness through Paul and Silas.  He will help him forward even when Paul and Silas are gone. 

Impact is good, but it cannot take the place of Jesus.  Thank God for people in your life who have impacted you and influenced your life for God, but in the end, keep your eyes  upon Jesus.

When they say that his whole household will be saved, it is not saying that he can believe for them.  Rather, he is in a pivotal position for the people of his household, family members and slaves.  Salvation is a personal work that impacts the world around us, starting at home.  Paul may have simply meant that his salvation would no doubt bring about the salvation of the home that he leads (i.e., the normal progression and not necessarily a guarantee).  However, he may actually be speaking prophetically.  It may be that the Lord is showing Paul that this man’s whole household will be saved.  Yet, this doesn’t change that they will each need to put their faith in Jesus, just like this jailer.

Several things happen in the dark early morning hours.  Paul and Silas spoke the word of the Lord to him and his household.  The jailer washes the stripes on their backs, which had been left unattended.  He and his family are all baptized.  Wow, what a day!

This jailer in one day went from being normal to being suicidal to being joyful.  Just who are these prisoners?  And, just who was the prisoner?  Paul and Silas didn’t act like normal prisoners because they knew that they were still free in all the ways that matter.  The served the Lord of Freedom.  Whereas, this jailer who was not in prison, was the one who really needed to be set free from the judgment that loomed over his head without Jesus.

The next time you are tempted to complain about your situation ask yourself this question.  Just who is the prisoner here?

Prisoner audio

The Acts of the Apostles 60

Subtitle: The Jerusalem Council III

Acts 15:22-29.  This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on October 22, 2023.

We will finish up our look at the Jerusalem Council, which took place between A.D. 48 to 50.  The decision of this original group should settle the issue of what is required for Gentile salvation because it has the apostles trained by Jesus, as well as the elders and people who witnessed the life, ministry and resurrection of Jesus.  Yet, it is amazing how many ways through the years individuals and theologians of the Church have come up with to go wrong on this issue of salvation.

Down through the ages to our time, Church councils haven’t always done us a favor.  The further you move forward in time from the resurrection of Jesus, the more we see such councils supplanting Scripture with human reasoning.  It may even lead some to see such councils as a mistake, and against the will of God.  Yet, here we have a council set in the Word of God, and it is clear that it is a good thing for the Church.

The problem is not in convening a council to determine what the truth is in a matter, and what should be taught.   When you look through the history of these councils, you will always find an individual, or group, who are pushing a teaching that is new, or novel.  This creates turmoil among the churches as people deal with the confusion that new teaching brings.  They want to know what the truth actually is.  In Acts 15, that problem, or teaching, is the idea that Gentiles have to be circumcised and follow the Law of Moses in order to be saved.  Believing in Christ and following him by faith was not enough for them, and it began to cause trouble.

Leaders can cause trouble, but sometimes trouble percolates up through the group and leaders have to step in for the sake of group cohesion.  This is normal and good, if it is done correctly and in the right spirit.  These leaders job is not to determine what is best for the group, but rather to determine what the Lord Jesus is saying through the Holy Spirit.  Thus, we should have some mercy on the generations that convened councils, and stick to criticizing only the decisions, and reasoning behind them.

Thus, you will notice that this first council becomes a good template for how councils should operate.  The people should gather, look to what the Spirit is doing, and what the Scriptures say.  Even then, if we are not actually seeking God like we should, if we are not living in communion with Jesus through the Spirit, our fleshly approach to truth will not follow the Spirit of God, no matter how much we protest that we followed the template.  It is not a scientific formula.  It is a relationship with Jesus.

At the base of errors in doctrine are at least two persuasions.  We can over emphasize the role of human reasoning in coming to truth, even elevating a group or man as the ones, one, who have a sanctified mind for the group.  The more human reasoning is the foundation of our beliefs the more we will be off-track.  The other persuasion is that we can ignore reasoning, and the reasoning of God’s proven Word in Scripture.  This persuasion over-emphasizes the spiritual ability to know truth of the leader, or leaders.  It shuts down all debate because “I have the mind of the Lord and don’t have to answer your critiques.”

Let us recognize that God is the One who gave us our minds.  He does intend us to use them.  However, our minds are not capable of assessing truth in these spiritual matters without God’s help.  At the best, our minds can only help us discern what God is showing us is the truth.  Even then, our reasoning is fraught with pitfalls, and humility is the order of the day.  The Lord has given us a foundation of His thinking in the Old Testament and the New Testament.  We need to take seriously their importance as well as the importance of what the Holy Spirit is doing now.  This will help to guard us from going into error.

Let’s look at our passage.

A letter is sent to the church in Antioch (v. 22-29)

We noted last week that it was James who had brought up the idea of sending a letter addressed to Antioch and the Gentile churches beyond them concerning this debated issue (v. 20).  This is exactly what they do.

Thus, we end up with a decision from a group of people at a particular point in time, and we also end up with a written record.  Paul and Barnabas will be able to tell what happened in Jerusalem, but there will also be an address from the church in Jerusalem describing things from their perspective.

We do not know if they had a vote, or people simply quit arguing against the truths that are recorded here.  Yet, they did come to an agreement, and create a letter, which Luke inserted in his Acts of the Apostles.  It is a good thing too because this is how we end up with the actual wording of the letter established for all time.  The church at Antioch was over-run in the 600’s by Muslims, and the original document is lost to us.

Three times in this passage (v. 22, 25, and 28), we have a word that is variously translated as “it pleased…,” or “it seemed good to…”  It is a word that has a range of certainty connected to it, from judging that something is certainly true, all the way to believing that something has a good probability of being true.  I think this passage the council was pretty certain that they had determined the mind of God on this matter.  They were not just giving their best guess, or sheer human reasoning on the matter.

In verse 22, we have listed that the apostles, elders, and the whole church were in on the decision.  The decision and plan to send a letter seemed good to all of them.

The judges in the Old Testament were not supposed to imagine the best solution for a case.  Rather, they were supposed to render the decision of the LORD.  Of course, they would look to what the Law said on a matter, but they would also seek wisdom from God’s Spirit- that is if they had a heart for God.  The Scriptures and the Holy Spirit help God’s people to understand truth when they are truthfully seeking it. 

You may also recognize that there is no sense in the story that an approach is being ramrodded through by leaders.  Even Paul and Barnabas are quite subdued in Luke’s account, only giving testimony to what the Spirit was doing among Gentiles.  I believe that they exercised wisdom to let the Jerusalem church come to a decision without undue pressure from them.  It was important that God showed them the truth.

We can be guilty today of practicing the leadership style of the world.  We can learn how to manipulate the stupid sheep to do what we know they need to do.  It is stylish to build forums and means for the little people to feel like they had a say and participated in the process, but in the end, the group will end up at a pre-decided decision that was made by the ultra-smart leaders.  Such manipulative activity is not of the Spirit of God and is not a proper, godly way to come to decisions.  Of course, this about sums up our politics, and many of our churches in the land.

Praise God that this is not what happened back in Acts 15 at the Jerusalem Council.

In verse 25 it mentions in the letter that “It seemed good to us, being assembled in one accord.”  There is that word again.  They were in one accord.  They had a singular passion for determining what God would have them believe and teach.  They wanted to rightly represent the Lord Jesus, since they were subjected to persecution by people who assumed that they had the corner of the market on representing God.

Many have a singular passion alright, a singular passion for their own way.  If we gather in a group and everyone is fighting passionately for their own way, then we will never have a true spiritual unity.  However, even if we are manipulated into a decision that everyone agrees to, it is not a unity of the spirit, but a unity of the flesh that is guaranteed to breakdown along the way.

We lastly recognize that verse 28 mentions that “it seemed good to the Holy Spirit…”  Of course, God is absolutely sure what the right thing is.  There is no range of certainty when it comes to Him.  The seeming is all on the human side of this equation.  They had come to the conclusion that this is what the Spirit of God was teaching them.  Yet, they are being humble enough to recognize the fact that their reasoning was involved in this process.  Unity must always center upon God’s decisions, and leaders, churches, ought to be very humble in any such process.

They determine that it would be best to send some men along with the letter.  This would give the Jerusalem Church some official representation along with the letter, not that they would doubt the veracity of how Paul and Barnabas portrayed the council to the church of Antioch.  Yet, the original issue had to do with men who had come from Judea, but did not officially represent the church.  The bad experience they had with the earlier Judaizers could be overcome with the good experience of the true, official representatives sent with the letter.

The first of the two men listed is Judas, also called Barsabas.  This is the only time that this individual is mentioned in the New Testament.  The second name helps us to differentiate him from other men with the name Judas (Judah in Hebrew) like Judas Iscariot, or Judas, also called Thaddeus, or Judas (Jude) the brother of our Lord.

The second man listed is Silas.  He is going to become one of the men who helped Paul in his missionary journeys to come.  He will faithfully minister with Paul to the Gentiles.  He is always referred to as Silas in the book of Acts.  However, in his letters, the apostle Paul calls him Silvanus.  Silus is just a shortened form of Silvanus.

What were the qualifications of these men?  They were leading men from among the Jerusalem church.  They had risked their lives for the Gospel (v. 26), which means that they had a vested interest in promoting the true Gospel.  Also, in verse 32, we will later see that they are both prophets, and able to spiritually minister to the group in Antioch.

Luke gives us a word for word copy of the letter starting at verse 23.  It starts out by clarifying that the men, who had “troubled” them about following the Law of Moses, were not sent by Jerusalem.  I am sure that the intent is not only to state the truth for the record, but also to restore goodwill between Antioch and them.  The Jerusalem church had never been behind the attempt to trouble them on this matter.  Yet, they are helping to make things right because of the presence of the apostles of Jesus in their city, as well as many elders who had close connection to the ministry of Jesus.  They have a responsibility to the rest of the Church.

Some point to the words of Paul in Galatians 2:12.  They interpret them to believe that James was at least a stickler for Jews continuing to obey the Law of Moses, which would include separation from Gentiles.  To whatever degree James believed this, something was behind Peter’s change of attitude about eating with Gentiles when “men from James” arrived in Antioch.  We do not know exactly when the Galatians 2 incident happened.  Was it before or after this council?  From the words said and the decision made, you would think that it would have to be before..  However, we do not know for sure.

It is believed that some confusion on what Jews needed to do, may have lead to some over-zealous teaching on what Gentiles needed to do.  Regardless, the decision in the letter is quite clear.  Gentiles do not need to follow the Law of Moses.  Although the Church had never officially taught that Gentiles needed to obey the Law of Moses in order to be saved, it did take about 18 years for the Church to denounce the idea officially.

In fact, close attention to Peter’s testimony will even clarify salvation for Jews.  He questions in verse 10, “Why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?”  Also, he said in verse 11 that “we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved in the same manner as they.”  Earlier he had described that manner as “by faith.”  This council didn’t just hammer out the means of salvation for Gentiles, but for Jews as well.  Even Jews do not need to follow the Law of Moses in order to be saved by Jesus.

The letter next declares that two men named Judas and Silas are accompanying the letter.  This is a first-century security mechanism for validation.

Finally, the letter stipulates the three issues that were being prohibited to the Gentiles (and Jews).  They were to abstain from things offered to idols, abstain from eating or drinking blood (things strangled still have blood in the meet), and they were to abstain from sexual immorality.  They are referred to as necessary, and yet, it simply says that if they will restrain themselves from doing these things that they will “do well.”  It is a burden being placed upon the Gentiles, but no heavy burden as Peter called the Law of Moses.

This is not only wisdom, but also obvious.  If you are following Jesus, then all hint of following idols and the things associated with idolatry needs to drop off.  You cannot have loyal faith in Jesus and still remain attached to idols and idolatry.  This loyalty issue has trust and faith at its core.

The blood issue was addressed last week, but would help Jews and Gentiles within the Church to be able to get along with one another.  Plus, it would retain a clear line around the subject of how we obtain life and power.  The pagans ate and drank animal blood for ritualistic reasons connected to their idols.  Jesus is our source of life, and our sacrifice now.

Lastly, we are told in the New Testament in many places to flee sexual immorality.  The moral components of the Law of Moses are reiterated by the apostles throughout the New Testament and Christians need to obey them, not because we are following the Law of Moses, but rather, because we are following Jesus Christ and His apostles who laid down these necessary things to avoid and necessary things to do.

Let me close by revisiting this issue of dead works versus works of faith.  We can fall into two extremes if we are not careful.  On one hand, we can be so against “dead works” and working for salvation that we promote doing nothing, even sinning.  However, on the other hand, we can be so intent against sin that we make a long list of things people have to do in order to be truly saved.

We need to go back to the Word of God.  What does it say is necessary for salvation?  It is to believe in Jesus, to put our trust in Him.  We then follow Jesus, who gave us the apostles and the Holy Spirit, and they gave us the New Testament.

This calls for humility in any issue.  I can be wrong and should not stir up trouble within a church.  Yet, whole churches and denominations can be wrong because they have inherited a system that has error riddled within it.  Only Jesus can save us, and it calls for faithful, courageous trust in Jesus, both to save us and to help us come to the knowledge of the truth.

None of us can do enough to save ourselves.  We can only put our faith upon Jesus.  However, once Jesus has accepted my faith and put me in a safe place, I can do good works that are clean before God.  What makes them clean?  They are clean because they are not done out of the selfish reason to make ourselves look good to God.  Rather, they are done out of thanks to Jesus for salvation and the belief, the faith, that He is helping us to become like God through the works He leads us to do by His Word and by His Spirit.

So, when you help people, or go to church on any particular day, and you do it because you love Christ and want to honor him, it can be a clean work acceptable unto God and makes you more like Jesus.  However, if I do these things because I believe I have to do these things to achieve my way into heaven, then they become dead works.  They are not really done in Christ by the Spirit, but in the flesh.

May God help us to come alive to Jesus by the Help of the Holy Spirit in order to do the works that He has created us to do.  “For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.”  (Ephesians 2:10).

Jerusalem Counsel III Audio

The Acts of the Apostles 59

Subtitle: The Jerusalem Council II

Acts 15:13-21.  This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on October 15, 2023.

We continue to look at the gathering in which the First-Century Church settled the question on what Gentiles had to do in order to be saved.

Let’s make it clear that the Church and its leaders do not have the authority to promote anything but what God is saying and doing.  The Church is not a business that Jesus started and current leaders can choose to do something different.  Salvation is not a product that we can tweak in order to be more profitable, or any other human aspiration.

In reality, the leaders in this gathering were seeking to discern and come to agreement upon what the Lord Jesus wanted them to do and to teach.

This is an important distinction because, when you look at the history of the Church, you will find that over time leaders began to look more to human reasoning to lead them than to the Word of God and the leading of the Holy Spirit.

Like ambassadors of a great king, we are to rightly represent Him to the world.  This is important in general, but it is especially important to those who are responding to the Gospel of Jesus.  We do not want to be guilty of misleading those whom God plans to save.

Last week, we looked at Peter’s testimony, and then we looked at the testimony of Barnabas and Paul.  Now we are going to look at the testimony of James, the brother of the Lord.

Let’s look at our passage.

They gather to make a decision: James’s testimony (v. 13 -21)

Luke only gives the name of James without any other description.  This is not the apostle James, the brother of John, sons of Zebedee.  James was put to death by Herod Agrippa I in Acts 12:2.  He was the first of the apostles to die, and his brother was apparently the last (separated by around 45 years or so).

This could make us question God.  Why?

There is a certain amount of testing that we all need, and yet there are also a variety of the kinds of witness and testimony that we can be.  Sometimes God simply lets certain things happen and play out as people intend, and yet other times He has something more specific that He wants to happen, so He intervenes.

We must be careful of thinking God will always part the Red Sea if a person really knows Him, or if He is really involved in a matter.  Of course, God can do a dramatic miracle any time He pleases.  Yet, we can take a clue from the New Testament story of the resurrection of Lazarus.  Four days after he died and was buried, Jesus showed up and miraculously raised him from the dead.  Yet, even Lazarus came to death’s door a second time and Jesus didn’t come down from heaven to raise him up.  There were probably a few people keeping watch for at least 4 days, just in case. 

Yet, Jesus didn’t show up.  Why not?  Our inheritance is not living in a mortal body forever.  Lazarus had lived a full life and it was time for him to rest from his Gospel labor, and enter into the joys of the Lord.

My main point is that we can over promote the miraculous, or the providence  of how long we live.  Israel’s problem was never that they didn’t have enough miracles.  Their problem was walking in faith with God after the miracle.  In fact, that is not just Israel’s problem, but a human problem.  In fact, we often have trouble trusting God even as He is doing the miraculous in our lives. 

God does miracles from time to time, but the longer period is walking in trusting faith in between.  The tension of having an impossible mission is punctuated by God showing up from time to time in amazing ways.  Yet, we need to walk in faith regardless.

Tradition has always held that this is the half-brother of Jesus, though there are some groups that try to make out that Mary did not have any other kids after Jesus.  The record shows that Joseph was not a biological father to Jesus (the Holy Spirit created a child within Mary).  Yet, he and Mary did have children later:  James, Jude, Joses, and others.  None of the brothers of Jesus believed in him until after the resurrection.  Once they believed, they quickly became pillars in the Jerusalem church.

The only place in the Bible where it mentions that James was a brother of Jesus is in Galatians 1:19.  James, who wrote the book of James, never calls himself the brother of the Lord.  He calls himself, “James, a bondservant [slave] of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ…”

For some people that was big doings.  But, Paul makes the point in Galatians 1 through 2 that such is not important before God.  James is not taking the place of Jesus, as if he were in a line of succession.  No man will ever succeed the Lord Jesus who reigns forever and ever.

James starts out by referencing the testimony of Peter.  It is clear that James agrees with Peter’s conclusions and that his purpose is to give supporting evidence and then offer a solution.  He mentions in verse 14 that Peter had described how God had visited the Gentiles in order to take out of them a people for His name.  This helps us to see what James is focusing on, Gentiles belonging to Yahweh like Israel did.

It is interesting that Peter’s testimony focuses upon the power and work of the Holy Spirit in teaching him, and powerfully working among the Gentiles through him.  He gives testimony to the supernatural move of God, and is very practical, focused on activity of the Spirit of God.

The testimony of James is more theological, and looks to Scripture.  Most likely, James did not have any visions himself.  We are not told whether Jesus appeared to him during the 40 days following the resurrection.  Regardless, James knows the Scriptures, and he sees a connection between Scripture and what Peter is saying.

First James points out that the words of the prophets (plural) agree with this idea of the Gentiles becoming a people belonging to God.  James is going to quote one of those prophets, but the verse he is going to quote is merely representative of a large number of other places he could have gone to and quoted.  He could have mentioned God’s promise to Abram that through him the nations would be blessed.  He could have quoted Moses telling Israel that God would make them jealous through a foolish nation.  He could have quoted Isaiah saying that the death of God’s servant would be to precious to only redeem Israel, but that he would also become a light to the Gentiles.

However, James thinks of Amos 9:11-12.  This passage clearly pictures the Gentiles being called by the name of the LORD.

By the way, in general, quotes of the Old Testament that are given in the New Testament are clearly from a Greek translation called the Septuagint that was made in the 200’s BC. (also designated as LXX for the 70 scholars who worked on the project),  Long story short, there are sometimes where the LXX differs from the Old Testament texts in Hebrew that the Pharisees maintained from the first century down to now.  The reality is that not everyone read and wrote in Hebrew.  The Bibles of the early Church were the LXX and Greek copies of the Gospels and Letters of the Apostles.  These were later translated into Syriac and Latin, among other languages.  Even though there may be some differences in word choice between the LXX and the oldest Hebrew manuscript that we have, those differences do not change anything that is essential.

I bring this up because Amos 9:11-12 has a few differences from the LXX.  We will deal with them as we come to them.

Amos first talks about the fallen tabernacle of David.  God will raise it back up and repair its damage.  What is this tabernacle of David?  Moses had built a tabernacle, a tent, to house the ark of the covenant.  This was used by Israel in the desert and brought into the promised land.  The tabernacle was set up in a few different places, but Shiloh becomes the main place from the time of Joshua to Samuel.  Eli’s sons try to use the ark of the covenant as a talisman against the Philistines, and it is captured in a defeat.  At the same time, Eli falls and dies.   This appears to taint the place of Shiloh, so the tabernacle is moved to Gibeon, but the ark never returns to it. 

David wanted to build a temple, but God would not let him.  His son would do it.  Thus, David put up a temporary tent in Jerusalem in order to house the ark until the temple was finished.  This would be the closest thing to a literal tabernacle of David.  However, the temple replaced this tent.  It is quite clear that this is not about raising up a literal tent that had belonged to David.

This is where we must recognize that God used a word play in 2 Samuel 7 when he told David that he could not build the temple.  Instead of David building a house (temple) for the Lord, God would build a house (dynasty) for David.  In fact, one of the offspring of David would be a son to God and God would be a father to him.  This son would inherit a forever kingdom and restore Israel.  The prophets all picked up on this theme of a Messianic Son of David who would raise up Israel and subdue the Gentiles.  However, God continued to add more to these prophecies.  The main point is that the “tabernacle of David” had fallen a long time ago.  The last Davidic king was taken out by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC.  No Son of David sat on a throne over Israel for the last 600 years.  This is what is meant by a broken down and ruined tabernacle.  Who could raise up such a thing?  Only Messiah.

James clearly sees the raising up of Jesus as a fulfillment of this raising up of the tent of David.  Though Jesus was not ruling in Jerusalem, he is at the right hand of the Father awaiting the day in which it is time to make his enemies his footstool (Psalm 110).  The line of David had been restored, and the glorified Jesus can never die again.  He is both the restarting, and the true end of the Line of David.

This leads to the second part of the prophecy in Amos.  The broken tent is raised up in order to “possess the remnant…all the Gentiles who are called by My [the LORD’s] name.”  There is a question on whether it is the remnant of Edom or the remnant of Adam (i.e., humanity).  Hebrew originally had no vowels and they have the same consonants.  However, because there is a parallelism here, the next phrase that is not in question settles it, “the Gentiles” are intended.  Since we end up in the same place (the Gentiles), I am not too worried about whether Amos 9:12 should read “the remnant of Edom,” or “the remnant of mankind.”  Both ultimately say the same thing.

The next issue is to notice that in Amos the tabernacle of David is raised up to possess the remnant, and the quote from James says that the tabernacle is raised up “so that the rest of mankind may seek the LORD.”  This may seem to be contradictory at first, but give me a second and I will show you that they are two sides of the same coin.

Notice that the Messiah coming forth would both raise up the line of David, but also have an impact on the Gentiles.  Let’s start with the verb possess.  The Messiah would possess, or take possession of, the remnant of the Gentiles.  A remnant is always a small faithful group in the midst of a larger group that is not.  It can also mean a small group that survive a judgment of God, and thus are the blessed of the LORD.  We should also notice that the second part of Amos 9:12 is that the remnant are “called by My name.”  Who is the ruling Messiah of Israel?  It is Jesus who even now is possessing the remnant of the Gentiles and will possess the remnant of those who miraculously survive the Great Tribulation.

The point is that “possess” does not essentially mean to stomp on, destroy, dominate, or tyrannize.    It essentially means to inherit.  It is not a negative thing for the Gentiles here, it is a positive thing.  How does the Bible describe Gentiles (and Jews) as a possession of God?  We are called a “Treasured Possession,” also “Jewels.”  The flip side to Jesus inheriting the remnant of the Gentiles concerns what it takes to be part of the remnant.  Those who are seeking salvation and believe on Jesus become his possession.  Thus, to possess and to seek are merely two sides of the same revelation.  There is both seeking and possessing going on. 

Basically James is saying that the Bible prophesies what Peter is describing.

Then, James says, “Known to God from eternity are all His works.”  In a sense, this is not a new thing to God.  It may seem shocking and surprising to them, but God had been planning and leading up to this moment long before He even laid the foundations of the earth.

Again, James cannot be clearer that he agrees with Peter that they are seeing the prophesied move of God to take a people for Himself from among the Gentiles.  It is also good to see the Church working together paying attention to what the Spirit of God is doing now, and also what the Scriptures say, i.e., the sure and proven work of the Holy Spirit in the past.  We can become off-base when we emphasize one over the other.  We need both working together because the same Holy Spirit is behind both.

At this point, James puts forward a solution, or resolution in verse 19.  He says, “I judge…”  Some people read far more than they should into this.  James is not giving a decision for the whole group.  This could just as easily be interpreted as “I opine (it is my opinion)…”  James has made up his mind and is completely convinced by the evidence.  There are two main aspects to the resolution that James puts forth.

He determines that Jewish believers should not trouble the Gentile believers who are turning to God.  Essentially, he is referring to requiring them to obey the Law of Moses.  Troubling those who are turning to God, or have already turned to God, is something that we would associate with the wicked, and not God’s righteous people.  Though the terminology of James is not as dire as Peter’s (“why do you test God putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples…”), he still uses a disparaging term, “trouble.”

Troubling people who are coming to faith in Jesus can be a problem for the Church today.  We can try to stipulate things that God never commanded.  However, some groups seem to believe it is troubling people to put the commands of the Lord Jesus Christ and His apostles before them.  We should say no more and no less than what the New Testament puts before us.

The wicked do not realize the danger they are in when they trouble God’s people.  In truth, they bring trouble upon themselves and will perish in the way if they do not repent.

The second part of James’ resolution is to write to the Gentiles that they abstain from three things.  It lists four, but two of them are two aspects of the same issue.  He believes that Gentiles should only be told to abstain from things polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from eating things strangled, and from ingesting blood.

Why these three things and where is James getting this?  Some see a connection to Leviticus 17 and 18.  In this section, God recognizes that there will be people who are not Israelites living among them.  He does not require them to follow all the Law of Moses if they are going to live among His people, but He does place some prohibitions upon them.  Leviticus 17 brings up the issue of idolatry.  If they want to do a sacrifice, it can only be at the tabernacle, and it can only be a sacrifice to Yahweh.    All of Leviticus 18 deals with the sexual immorality that was rampant among the Canaanites.  No foreigner who lived in Israel was to be involved in any sexual immorality.  Lastly, Leviticus 17 talks about blood issues.  The pagans often drank blood and used blood in their rituals as a way of gaining power and life.  For Israel, the blood of the animals was closely associated to the offerings before Yahweh.  He commanded them not to eat meat with the blood still in it, which would also prohibit straight out drinking blood.  Strangulation does not allow an animal to bleed out, which causes the blood to coagulate in the vessels and tissue of the animal.  No foreigner was to eat meat that had not been properly drained of its blood.

Coming back to James, he ties these prohibitions in verse 21 to the fact that Moses has been preached in many cities throughout many generations.  Though some differ as to how this is a “because” to the prohibitions, I believe that it has to do with Gentiles coming to the Lord being around Jewish people.  The Church is going to grow and expand into cities where there are Jews who need Jesus too.  Perhaps, James sees this as wisely removing some barriers to Jews and Gentiles coming into the Church together.  The Gentiles would not be trying to keep the Law, and the Jews could see God’s word instructing the minimum that they need to do.

Regardless of whether this is all how James thought about it, there is more than one way to support abstaining from anything associated with idols, sexual immorality and eating/drinking blood.  Simply following the “Law of Love” will teach you that sexual immorality is a selfish way of life that brings great sorrow into relationships, families, and societies.  The moral issues of the Old Testament were all reiterated by God’s apostles in the New Testament and are binding upon the believer today.  I don’t have to go to the Law of Moses to know and believe that God does not want me to murder, and if I do, I will not be right before Him.

We will finish this next week, but let me end with this.  We have the same Word of God, and the same Holy  Spirit today.  Yes, many denominations and leaders in the Church have made ungodly decisions throughout history.  However, we must not let that sidetrack us from looking to God and seeking His leading.  We can throw up our hands saying that “it doesn’t work anymore!”  Or, “God doesn’t care.”  Yet, we would be wrong.  God cares deeply and is always ready at every moment to lead us by His Spirit.  It is we who become hurt, apathetic, and uncaring about seeking Him.  May God help us to be a people of the Word who are also seeking the leading of the Holy Spirit.  If we will do this, then He will lead us forward and help us to reach others.

Council II audio