Acts 11:1-18. This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on July 9, 2023.
There is a lot of water under the bridge within Christianity. We can find ourselves in situations where some Christians are saying one thing about whether or not God is moving, and other Christians are saying the opposite.
This precise situation developed during spring this year at Asbury University. Reports began to circulate that a revival was happening. Some Christians were quick to embrace it. However, other Christians began with a more stand-offish approach and generally rejected it as a true revival.
We could be tempted to think of this as a Wesleyan Holiness-movement/Pentecostal issue. Those in this camp would naturally embrace it as a revival and non-Pentecostals would tend to reject it. However, this happens even within the Pentecostal camp. The Toronto "Revival" of the 1990's saw different Pentecostal groups for and against calling it a revival, even within the same denominations.
We should also note that it is possible to have true revival, but also have fake activity attaching itself to it due to pretenders. This should cause us to pause and think about whether or not we should be pronouncing judgment upon what is actually happening in these cases. Many Christians can find themselves maneuvered into making a judgment when they were not there and most of their evidence is from people who were either biased, or not there either. This is called hearsay. In many cases, there is no reason for me (i.e., the average Christian) to make a judgment, yea or nay. Perhaps, if you were a pastor in the town, or a denominational leader whose churches were being impacted, you would need to do some due diligence and find out for yourself what is really happening. Yet, most of us should simply pray that it really is a revival. Ultimately, my biggest concern should be whether I am "revived" in the Lord myself, as opposed to worry about what is happening elsewhere.
We Pentecostals have a certain group of us who act like "roadies" of revival. Whenever they get wind of something "happening" somewhere, they jump on a plane, in a car, etc. and head towards the latest report of the "fire of God."
This reminds me of the gold rush towns in the American frontier. In fact, I grew up in an old gold town. When word was spread that there was gold in Pierce, Idaho, over 5,000 people made their way into the hills of central Idaho, about 3,000 of them were Chinese. Within short order, the easy gold would be played out, requiring much harder work for much finer gold. Of course, then word would come around that there was gold in Elk River, and many of the people abandoned the area to go to the next rush. "Wait, now there is gold in the Yukon!" Many ran after the gold that was larger and easier to get. However, it has been said that the Chinese, who stayed behind in Pierce and did the hard work to capture the "flour" gold after the rush had left, were able to take more gold out of that area than during the rush.
I don't believe that this is what God intends for His people, chasing after a rush of the Spirit. Rather, in Scripture, we see a people who are seeking God and waiting upon Him for His seasons of refreshing. Of course, this book, The Acts of the Apostles, was such a time of God's favor and refreshing.
We are told that there will be much deception and confusion in these end times, and if I am chasing after every cry of "spiritual gold in them there hills," I will not spiritually mature in the ways that make me look more like Jesus. I will then become fodder for the deceptions and confusion that will only grow stronger.
We should note that the Apostle Paul, in what he believed to be his last opportunity to speak to the elders of the Ephesus church, warned that wolves would attack the church from outside, and perverse men would rise up from among their ranks. They, we, would need to be vigilant to help protect the people and teach them to be wise, discerning.
Our cynical side can scoff. How can I know? In our spiritual immaturity, we may feel like God has not made it clear enough and the confusions are too many. However, Christ promises those who follow him that he will be with us to the end of the age. He promises that the Spirit of Truth will guide us. We need to be a people who are growing in our knowledge of God's Word, and in our experience of the work of His Spirit. Don't settle for anything less than the real thing. May we be a people who are being revived daily as we lean upon the Spirit of God in our current situations.
Let's look at our passage.
We were told at the end of chapter 10 that Peter stayed with Cornelius and crew for a "few" days. However, the word is far more indefinite than the word "few." It would be like saying that he stayed for a certain number of days. It could be days, it could be weeks, yet, probably not years.
Peter has been on the road for a while encouraging believers, and yet the Holy Spirit had also done some amazing miracles through him. Aeneas was healed of paralysis at Lydda. Tabitha was raised back to life in Joppa. The miracle of people believing upon Jesus and being saved occurred everywhere he went, and now, Gentiles have been baptized in the Holy Spirit.
Peter now returns to Jerusalem. Have you ever noticed that other people can be busy spreading rumors and a case against you when you are focused on doing a good thing for the Lord? Many times the people who do the most to spread a rumor were not there. They heard a story from someone who heard a story. They can also have an ulterior motive, which leads them to focus on things that were not the main thing. They may even home in on things, magnifying them above what is the truth. We should be very slow to make any judgments from such "witnesses."
Verse one tells us that the apostles and the brethren of Judea had heard the news about the Gentiles receiving the Gospel. However, there seems to be a particular group among the believers that has been developing along with the Church as it grew. This group is referred to as "The Circumcision" by Luke and Paul.
During this transitional period, the Church was finding it bearings in regards to what Church would look like. Would they continue on much the same way as before, obeying the Law of Moses, but believing in Jesus? The apostle Paul was strongly against such ideas from day one (see Galatians 2:5). Others like The Circumcision group were the opposite. We do not have an idea what percentage they were of the group of believers or of the apostles themselves. However, Peter represents that man in the middle who wants to obey God, but is unsure what God is doing in this regard. He starts out cautious, and yet, God faithfully teaches and leads him to the truth.
As Peter comes into Jerusalem, we are told that those of the circumcision group contend with him over his contact with the uncircumcised in Caesarea. I believe that Peter would be meeting with the church of Jerusalem and, in that context, a subset of the group forces this issue to be front and center. To quote their accusation against Peter, "You went into uncircumcised men and ate with them!"
It is quite telling that they do not mention the faith of the Gentiles at Caesarea. They don't mention that the Holy Spirit came upon the Gentiles just as He had upon the Jews at Pentecost. It may be that this part of the news never travelled to Jerusalem. Regardless, they are focusing on the fact that Peter had dinner with these Gentiles. Why?
I mentioned previously that the Law of Moses shows that there are things that are holy and things that are unholy. We most likely have a knee-jerk definition of "unholy." It is easy to see it as something that is evil, but that is not what it means. To be holy is to be set apart for God's purposes. Those who are unholy are not set apart for God's purposes. You can picture a bowl in the temple. It is holy, i.e., set apart for God's purposes in the temple. The holy priest that uses a holy bowl within the temple for God's prescribed worship is serving God's purposes. He no doubt has a bowl back at home, which his wife uses to serve him soup. That bowl is not holy, i.e., unholy. It is only for common purposes. It would be just as wrong to use a common, unholy bowl in the temple as it would be to take a holy bowl home and use it for your own common purpose.
This brings up the issue of clean and unclean. A holy person, or object, must be ritually clean to do whatever God's purpose is. The holy thing can become unclean for various reasons. In that unclean state, the holy thing cannot be used for God's purpose. However, there is a mechanism by which the holy thing or person can be made clean again . Thus, uncleanness can come from something sinful, or from something that isn't. A case in point, if a family member dies and you help to bury them (note: that this is not a sinful thing to do), you could not participate in a temple ceremony until you had gone through a cleansing ritual. Contact with Gentiles was similar. Gentiles were unclean and often did "unclean" things (sinful, or not). Many traditions had been built up over the years to avoid such uncleanness, and one of them was to not have close contact with Gentiles (like going to their house and eating with them).
This would have been ingrained into the Jewish person from childhood, and would not come easy to most. It is amazing that through Jesus, the Gentiles were now considered holy. I don't mean they were all now saved, but that they were all now set apart for the holy purpose of God. They need to then come to Jesus and be cleansed from their unclean state so that they can now serve God in Spirit and in Truth.
This is the issue that they are having difficulty accepting. Those of the circumcision are stuck in this old construct of Gentiles being unholy and unclean by virtue of not being Jews. They want to make salvation and full access available only to those who obeyed the Law of Moses and believed upon Jesus.
I titled this sermon, "Peter Defends the Work of God." It is better to see it as an explanation of what God did. I mean, who can defend God? God is His own defense! Yet, we can engage with one another over what God is doing, even persuade one another in how to understand it.
If God is doing something, all of us should refrain from resisting and fighting against it. It just seems to be a no-brainer for a Christian to support what God does. We could also simply be apathetic to it. I know that this is not what God wants for us. We need to be supportive and joining God in what He is doing. That is the best case scenario. Of course, the age old question, "How can I know?" We will come back to that.
Peter simply gives a chronological description of the reasons for his actions. Yet, I think it is important to pay attention to the categories of "evidence" that God uses to convince Peter. God was giving Peter some facts, or evidence, so that he could understand the God-given conclusion. This is important. It was not man's natural ability to reason and make good conclusions that brought the Church to embrace Gentiles who believed upon Jesus. Rather, God used the fact that we can reason and see conclusions to show Peter what was right. From the very beginning of this issue, we will see that God lays the conclusion on the table up front. "What God has cleansed you must not call common (unholy)."
The first evidence is the vision that he had at Joppa. In this vision, God used the same issue, but with the area of foods. Just as Gentiles could defile a person, so certain foods could defile a person. Jesus had not only made all people holy unto the Lord, but he had also made all foods holy unto the Lord. The message of the vision was clear. If God makes something clean, we must not try to say it isn't clean.
Peter also tells them that the vision was repeated three times. God only needs to say something once, but He knows that this is a tough issue to swallow for Peter and other Jews.
I would categorize this as personal teaching, or leading, from God's Spirit. Of course, Peter is not a new Christian. He is an apostle hand picked and trained by Jesus Christ in order to help establish the faith once and for all delivered to the saints in that generation. Peter's experience is quite objective to him, but we label it subjective because no one else saw it. There is nothing wrong with subjective personal experience, but we must be careful in this area. It needs to have other confirmation.
In verses 11-12, Peter states that the three men from Caesarea show up immediately following his vision. At this point, Peter has another personal leading directly from the Spirit of God. Peter has demonstrated an ability to know when the Spirit of God is speaking to Him. The Spirit tells him that men are arriving to ask him to go with them. He is told to go with them "doubting nothing."
We should also note that the timing of this is also part of the evidence. It is said that "coincidence" is not a kosher word. Sometimes coincidence is only that, a coincidence without any common causality behind them. However, it is part of the evidence. They show up immediately after he has this strange vision.
We should also note that Peter wisely takes some unbiased witnesses along with him on this journey of faith.
Peter also tells them about the angelic appearance to Cornelius in verses 13-14. The angel is the one who told Cornelius where Peter was and that Peter would tell him the words by which he and all his household would be saved. Notice that this turned out to be correct on both accounts. This has three aspects to it. Cornelius had his own personal leading directly from God. Yet, it also has a corroborating affect upon what God is teaching others. Thus, I will label this confirming personal leading of another person who is a believer in God. We also have knowledge supplied by God that proves true.
In verse 15, Peter explains that the Holy Spirit came upon them when he began to preach to them. Peter could not deny what he saw happening to these Gentiles. I would call this an objective work of the Holy Spirit. Though Peter and the men who were with him could not deny this was the Holy Spirit, there are always people who will deny the undeniable. Yet, for those who had an inkling of the Spirit of God, it was obvious. No one had coached these Gentiles on what "should" happen. Peter had not even described or talked about the Promised of the Father, the Baptism with the Holy Spirit. This is a sovereign action of God through the Spirit.
I believe that verse 16 is critical. We should note that Peter does not speak "ex cathedra," that is, from the chair of his position. He is simply a man being led by the Spirit of God.
We don't know why God used Peter greatly among his fellow Jews. Why wasn't it John "the beloved?" From a standpoint of taking the Gospel to the ends of the earth, Paul was the most used of God than any of The Twelve.
It is not about position, or an office, or who received the baton from whom. It is about the Spirit of God working in and through people to accomplish the will of God. Peter clearly knows this in this moment.
He reminds the group that the Lord Jesus had told him (and others) that "John indeed baptized with water, but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit." (Acts 1:5). Of course, we should add the testimony of John the Baptist in Mark 1:8. He referred to Jesus as the One who would baptize with the Holy Spirit. On top of this, we could add the many verses throughout the Old Testament that emphasize Messiah's salvation going to the Gentiles. An example is found in Isaiah 49:6.
"Indeed He says, ‘It is too small a thing that You should be My Servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved ones of Israel; I will also give You as a light to the Gentiles, that You should be My salvation to the ends of the earth.’ ”
I would categorize this evidence as the Word of the Lord. Subjective experiences that are of God will line up with His Word.
Some may say that we are no longer in that transitional time. Yet, we do have transitional times as an individual where God starts to do something different in our lives. In those times, it is critical that we know how to hear from the Lord and to be led by Him. We don't want to be fighting against what God is doing in our life, but yielding and serving His purpose.
This same dynamic happens in families, nations, even republics, and the whole world. It is interesting that the world is describing this time globally as a time of transition. It is important that we be connected to the Spirit of God, and hearing from Him. Otherwise, we may find ourselves being deceived by the spirit of this age.
We may complain that one person says this and another says that. How can I know? Yes, this is true. There are all kinds of voices "out there." Jesus never sent us to the voices out there to find truth. He said that He would lead us by His Spirit. You need to know for yourself. You can hear what other think, but you won't do what God wants by following what others think. You have to hear from the Lord yourself. At the most, the thinking and experiences of others can only be a confirmation of what God is doing in your heart and mind.
Verse 17 gives the logical conclusion to so many lines of evidence. "Who was I that I could withstand God?" Peter knows that he truly is nobody without Jesus. In and of ourselves we are all nobody to stand against God. And yet, there was still a call of God on Peter's life. That call doesn't bless everything Peter thinks. No, it is, "Peter, come follow me!" Peter had enough time being rebuked by the Lord that he knew he didn't want to fight God on this.
There are too many in the Church who are elevating their thinking over the work of God. We must be careful. Be careful of thinking such and such simply because a great person says we should think a certain way. Some have developed a cult-like adherence to men (living or dead) who may be smart people, but they are nothing without the Spirit of God, especially in resisting the Spirit of God. We can even be guilty of using the words of men who followed the Holy Spirit in their day in order to resist following the Spirit of God in our day.
This is the call to spiritual maturity. God gives the truth to these Gentiles through Peter, but this doesn't mean they forever have to go through Peter to know the truth of God. We need to come to know God for ourselves. This takes time.
Why would I want to resist the work of God? If you heard that God was working in your town, or even your family, wouldn't you be excited? In fact, God is doing something today. Maybe I have fallen asleep to what He is doing. Maybe I am not sober enough to recognize it. Worse, I may not even have a spiritual pulse. Yet, God in His grace wakes the sleeper, sobers the intoxicated, and raises the dead to new life!
Jesus had baptized these Gentiles in the Holy Spirit. Who was Peter to forbid them to be water baptized? The answer is simply no one. He had tried rebuking Jesus before, and he was not going there again.
More than this, who was Peter to continue to try and keep a distinction between himself and them because they were not circumcised? It was clear that God did not treat their uncircumcision as a mark of impurity. Of course, again, he is no one. And, to do so over the top of the leading and teaching of the Lord by His Spirit, would be rebellion.
You need to know where it comes from when people who are resisting God's work despise His work in you. In John 9, a man who had been blind from birth is healed by Jesus. He is later interrogated by the Religious Council. They pressure him to "Give God the glory! We know this man is a sinner!" He then tries to explain to them how what Jesus did had to be of God. This only made them angry. “ 'You were completely born in sins, and are you teaching us?' And they cast him out." Notice that this man is a nobody in their eyes, and they are quite the somebodies.
The blind man accepted that he was a nobody. "Whether he is a sinner or not, I do not know. One thing I do know; that though I was blind, now I see." This man had a personal experience with Jesus that no amount of cynicism, bullying, or theological treatises could take away. He was a nobody who had been touched by Jesus. At that point, he became greater than all the "great" learned ones of Israel. He sees Jesus as Messiah, and they want nothing to do with Jesus. What would you rather have: the touch of Jesus or the approval of such men?
To their credit, the men became silent. We know from the other passages in the New Testament that some of them would still chafe at this. However, they had nothing to say. The conclusion was clear. "God has also granted to the Gentiles repentance to life.”
We can focus so much on what people are doing (and that can be important), but it is better to focus on what the Lord Jesus is doing by His Holy Spirit. We are not the Apostles laying down the faith once and for all delivered unto the saints. However, like Peter, we can do our small part. Peter simply went with the men, heard the story of Cornelius, and began to preach. God did the heavy lifting because Peter and Cornelius did their small part. It wasn't Peter, it was Jesus. It isn't you, and it isn't me. However, it is us doing our small part, in the harness with Jesus! Don't you want to be a part of what God is doing? Pray and ask God's Spirit to help you first see, and then courageously step forward to work with Him in the field.
There are times in our personal life, in the life of our family, our church, or our republic, where it is critical to discern what our Lord desires of us. God uses personal leading of His Spirit, His confirming leading in the lives of others, the timing of events, His own sovereign works, and the Word of the Lord in order to teach us. May God help us to wake up to all the ways that He is trying to teach us. May we be a people of the Word, a people of prayer, a people of the Spirit and a people of the righteousness of Jesus Christ!