Mark 12:18-27. This sermon was preached by Pastor Marty Bonner on August 16, 2020.
We continue looking at the various teachings that Jesus gave within the temple compound during the week leading up to his crucifixion. Some of these teachings are initiated by Jesus, but some of them are initiated by the various groups that did not like Jesus. The antagonists today are a group called the Sadducees, more on them in a bit.
The trap today has to do with theology. What does the Bible actually teach? As the Sadducees try to trap Jesus with his own words, we are given a proof once again that Jesus cannot be trapped by mankind. He doesn’t just know the truth; he is the truth. As you listen to this passage today, I pray that you will come to understand that the modern world is not any better at “trapping God” than the ancient world was.
We may have greater technology, and we may have furthered the discussion of philosophy to a finer point, but we are still fallen creatures trying to prosecute the one who is not fallen. It won’t work. In the end, Jesus will be proven true and all who stand against him will be proven to be liars, lying to ourselves internally, and lying to the world externally. Trying to trap Jesus is to trap ourselves in the end.
Our only hope is to surrender to Jesus and ask him to save us because we cannot save ourselves. Let’s look at this passage.
Our question today has to do with whether or not there is such a thing as a bodily resurrection of those who have died. Although it is not precisely stated that way, Mark makes it clear up front that the Sadducees do not believe that a resurrection day was promised by God, and this is the source of their question.
So, who are these Sadducees? Let’s take about 6 minutes to look at the history that has led up to this point. During the 500’s BC, Israel was defeated by the Babylonians (modern day Iraq). Many of the Israelites were taken back to Babylon as captives. Then, the Persians defeated the Babylonians (they were from modern day Iran). The Persians allowed the Jews to return to Israel in order to rebuild their country, Jerusalem, and the temple. This was going on from the end of the 500’s through the 400’s BC.
The next change happens as the Greek empire under Alexander the Great rises up and defeats the Persians. From 330 BC to 167 BC, the Greeks dominate Israel and the apex of their control comes under Antiochus IV (Epiphanes) who ruled from Antioch, Syria. Over the course of these 160 years, Israel was heavily influenced by the Greek culture, which called itself Hellas and its peoples the Helenes. By the end of this period, many Jews had adopted Greek ways, using Greek names, refusing to circumcise their young, and adopting a Greek calendar, which changed the days on which the feasts of the Lord landed.
It is in this context that Antiochus Epiphanes lights the fuse of Israel by outlawing Jewish rituals, mandating the worship of Zeus, and slaughtering a pig to Zeus on the temple altar in Jerusalem. The next 50 years (167 BC to 110 BC) would be a tug-of-war between the Greeks and the rebel Israelites. It would also be a fight between Hellenized Jews who wanted a Greek government and those who wanted to stay faithful to the Old Testament and Yahweh.
During this time, a number of priests left Jerusalem and developed the Qumran community in the wilderness above the Dead Sea that we know by the Dead Sea Scrolls. They saw Jerusalem and its priests as corrupt and so they went into the wilderness to wait for Messiah to show up and fix everything. The priests who stayed in Jerusalem called themselves the Sadducees, which is a Greek form of the Hebrew name Zadok. The family of Zadok was the High Priest family. Even though the high priests were starting to compromise, the Zadokites or Sadducees felt that the High Priest should be followed without question. They were made up of the High Priest, the priests faithful to him, and many of the upper class in Israel. At some point, a more conservative group who had not gone into the wilderness began to separate themselves from the Sadducees, and that is the Pharisees.
The Sadducees did not believe in human spirits, or angels (see Acts 23:7), and thus they did not believe in a holding place for departed spirits (the grave) or a possible resurrection of these spirits. They were essentially the liberal “Christians” of their day.
Now that we have established who these Sadducees were, let’s look at their approach to Jesus. Instead of asking Jesus to prove from Scripture that there is a resurrection, they use a different strategy. They remind Jesus of the Kinsman Redeemer law mentioned in Deuteronomy 25:5. They then share a hypothetical story about a man who marries a woman, but dies without a child being born, i.e. no heir. The Law of Moses required the nearest kin, like a brother, to marry the woman and father a child with her that would legally carry the name of the man who died, and inherit his estate. This may seem strange in our modern culture, but this was very common throughout the ancient world. Their cultures were family and tribe oriented. Everything was done to keep the family and tribe strong, especially things having to do with offspring and inheritance. A widow had a problem. Who would take care of her? However, if she was childless then she had another problem. Who would take care of her in her old age? The family also has a problem. What shall we do with the dead brother’s estate, allow it to be severed and spread among the rest of the tribe, or legally supply an heir for him? Whether or not you think this is the proper way to deal with these things, the duty of a kin was to protect the name and inheritance of his close relatives. In fact, the whole story of Ruth centers on this law.
Now, in our hypothetical story, a second brother marries the woman, but dies before an heir is conceived. The same thing continues happening with all of the seven brothers, until the wife dies in the end having never had a child. This hypothetical situation sets up the absolute worse-case scenario for this law. It is similar to what happens in the story of Judah and Tamar. Tamar marries Judah’s firstborn, but he dies before a child is conceived. Then, Judah’s second son is married to Tamar, but he refuses to help her become pregnant. He dies as a judgment from God. So now, Judah’s third son should marry Tamar, but Judah is gun-shy. He suspects that his third son will die too, and so he creates a ruse to keep the marriage from happening. So, most likely this story would never actually happen. Most people would see the woman as cursed and refuse to marry her at that point.
It is important to see that the Sadducees are employing a debating technique that is called Reduction to Absurdity. Instead of rejecting your opponents view, you pretend as if it were true and show that it leads to an absurdity. They feel that their hypothetical creates such an absurd situation that the initial idea of resurrection should then come into question. The absurdity comes to the surface with the question, “Which of the men will have her as their wife in the Resurrection (that they don’t believe in)?”
I would point out two things. First, there is an inheritance problem here that they totally blow by. The laws of the kinsman redeemer had nothing to do with the resurrection. They were all about a woman having security and a man’s name not being lost within the tribe.
Second, the problem is not nearly as absurd as they make it. It would be the same problem if we ask, “Whose wife is Ruth in the Resurrection, Boaz or Mahlon?” The presence of seven guys doesn’t change the question, but they do make it more absurd. Ultimately, you could just say that the Bible is silent on this issue and therefore God will make the judgment then. This would resolve the issue without giving clarity about what exactly would happen. God is just and He can be trusted to give a wise decision. However, this is not how Jesus responds.
Before Jesus gives his answer, he explains in verse 24 why the Sadducees are wrong on this issue, but he does so in question form. The NKJV says that they are “mistaken,” but the idea is that they are being led astray, or off the path of truth. He is posing a rhetorical question, “Are you not being led astray, or deceived?” The answer is the obvious, yes, and that they should know it.
Why are they being led astray, or better, what is their weakness that has made them susceptible to error on this point? Jesus gives us two reasons.
First, they don’t know the Scriptures. Of course, they know the Scriptures in the sense of having read them, memorized much of them, and taught them. However, they don’t intimately know them. They cruise over passage after passage assuming that they have the truth without recognizing the implications in them that run counter to their philosophy. Instead, they use Scripture to back up their positions through proof-texts and human reasoning. If they really understood Scripture then they would not be led astray by people such as themselves who posit absurd hypotheticals, philosophies, and the reasoning of men. So, their first problem has to do with a real ignorance of the Scriptures and the proper understanding of what God was saying in them.
Second, they don’t know the power of God. Of course, if you were to ask them if God was all-powerful, they would have said that He was. However, they wouldn’t apply that power to the resurrection because they have already reasoned that it can’t be. This same problem happens with those who say that humans don’t have freedom to choose Jesus because that would mean that God is not completely sovereign. Yet, at the same time that they say that, they are limiting God’s sovereignty by refusing to accept that God could sovereignly choose to give men a free choice. God has the power and sovereignty to give man a real choice so that he can really choose. Human reasoning can become a barrier to actually hearing what the Word of God is saying.
When we understand just how powerful God is, the One who created the whole universe, visible and invisible, problems like this dissipate. Many reject the Bible because of things that sound impossible. However, if God does exist as the Bible depicts then it is not absurd that He can do that which we cannot conceive being done.
In verse 25, Jesus finally gets to the answer. Here, he reveals that the Sadducees are assuming something that God never said in His Word. It doesn’t say anywhere in the Bible that our marriages will continue into the Resurrection in any way. Now, it is a natural tendency to assume things and not question those assumptions. Their whole argument hinges on the reality of marriage within the resurrected age. Jesus reveals that the resurrection will not be a glorified repeat of this world. Instead, we will be like the angels of heaven. Angels do not need to propagate their species because God made them immortal.
Up until now, humans have been a mortal species. Yet, then we will not be so. Paul speaks of this in 1 Corinthians chapter 15. In the parallel passage of Luke 20:34, Jesus adds some more color to the statement.
“The sons of this age marry and are given in marriage. But those who are counted worthy to attain that age, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage; nor can they die anymore, for they are equal to the angels and are sons of God; being sons of the resurrection.”
The resurrection not only changes us as individuals, but it also changes us as a species. We can’t properly imagine the resurrected state because we have precious little understanding of what that means. We have only known mortality.
It is important to understand that Jesus doesn’t need chapter and verse to support what he is saying because he has come from the Father and knows the whole plan, whether it has been revealed before or not. Thus, in a way, Jesus is revealing new truth. He confirms the resurrection and he reveals that there will not be marriage there. Men and women will stand side by side in glorified bodies that are no longer male and female as we know them here. We will stand together as the adult children of God. The image is that we as a whole are the bride of Christ.
Yet, the Old Testament does have many passages that hint at, and even declare a belief in the resurrection. In Job 19:25-27, he says, “For I know that my redeemer lives, and at the last he will stand upon the earth. And after my skin has been thus destroyed, yet in my flesh I shall see God, whom I shall see for myself, and my eyes shall behold, and not another. My heart faints within me!” What kind of kinsman redeemer can redeem a person from the decay of their body? This is an amazing passage and there are others like it.
However, Jesus knows that the Sadducees do not accept doctrine that is not in the Pentateuch (the first 5 books of the Bible). Thus, Jesus uses the Burning Bush passage in Exodus 3. There, God tells Moses that He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. If the position of the Sadducees was correct then He would have to say that He was the God of Abraham, et al. Yet, He says that He is, present tense. In some way, Abraham and the other patriarchs were still very much alive. Their spirits were held in the paradise side of She’ol, or Hades, and God was not going to leave them there forever. In chapter 12 of his book, Daniel saw the day when multitudes who “slept in the dust of the earth,” would awake and rise “some to shame and everlasting contempt,” and others “to everlasting life.”
We must not settle for a cultural acceptance of Christianity, but rather pursue a relationship with the Father through Jesus, and the Scriptures that reveal him. We can only come to know them intimately by the help of God’s Holy Spirit. Praise the Lord that we serve a powerful God who has made clear His glorious future for those who believe upon Jesus Christ!